<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EffectiveUI Does Android change the game for Apple?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/</link>
	<description>Books, Community, Entrepreneurship, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mollerus</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mollerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwilker.com/j/index.cfm/2008/6/30/EffectiveUI-Does-Android-change-the-game-for-Apple#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Android should mean something to Apple. It&#039;s the same kind of threat that the PC posed to the Macintosh back in the 80&#039;s, where Apple had a closed, controlled, and more expensive computer system that lost major market share to a less-elegant but more open and affordable PC architecture (I&#039;m a Mac user, btw). I think that Android represents a major shift in the portable communications business model, and I think users will embrace it. It represents a completely open application platform, where users can choose their own hardware and software, and where communications, whether data or voice, will be a commodity service that you can change at will. Sounds like a personal computer with an Internet connection. It will be a portable personal computer with an Internet connection; just one that happens to be optimized to fit next to your head so that you can hear it and speak through it.  It&#039;s the logical next step, and Apple will have to react and adapt to stay in that market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android should mean something to Apple. It&#039;s the same kind of threat that the PC posed to the Macintosh back in the 80&#039;s, where Apple had a closed, controlled, and more expensive computer system that lost major market share to a less-elegant but more open and affordable PC architecture (I&#039;m a Mac user, btw). I think that Android represents a major shift in the portable communications business model, and I think users will embrace it. It represents a completely open application platform, where users can choose their own hardware and software, and where communications, whether data or voice, will be a commodity service that you can change at will. Sounds like a personal computer with an Internet connection. It will be a portable personal computer with an Internet connection; just one that happens to be optimized to fit next to your head so that you can hear it and speak through it.  It&#039;s the logical next step, and Apple will have to react and adapt to stay in that market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwilker.com/j/index.cfm/2008/6/30/EffectiveUI-Does-Android-change-the-game-for-Apple#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>@ Tom,

I agree, though what&#039;s funny, is that while Apple got their asses kicked by the PC. they certainly have come back, and not much has changed. They&#039;re still pretty closed up, though their hardware is at least industry standard now. 

My worry with Android is that it&#039;ll be a cluttery wasteland of too many apps, that suck, obscuring the ones that don&#039;t. 

Plus it&#039;s not so open, since TMO locked out Skype/VOIP. so if each carrier is demanding their own version of Android, I see that potentially making it useless since you can only program to the baseline, or exclude certain customers.

I also agree that Apple needs to wake up. They&#039;re as &quot;Too closed&quot; as I think google might be &quot;Too open&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom,</p>
<p>I agree, though what&#039;s funny, is that while Apple got their asses kicked by the PC. they certainly have come back, and not much has changed. They&#039;re still pretty closed up, though their hardware is at least industry standard now. </p>
<p>My worry with Android is that it&#039;ll be a cluttery wasteland of too many apps, that suck, obscuring the ones that don&#039;t. </p>
<p>Plus it&#039;s not so open, since TMO locked out Skype/VOIP. so if each carrier is demanding their own version of Android, I see that potentially making it useless since you can only program to the baseline, or exclude certain customers.</p>
<p>I also agree that Apple needs to wake up. They&#039;re as &amp;quot;Too closed&amp;quot; as I think google might be &amp;quot;Too open&amp;quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwilker.com/j/index.cfm/2008/6/30/EffectiveUI-Does-Android-change-the-game-for-Apple#comment-282</guid>
		<description>@ Tom,

I agree, though what&#039;s funny, is that while Apple got their asses kicked by the PC. they certainly have come back, and not much has changed. They&#039;re still pretty closed up, though their hardware is at least industry standard now. 

My worry with Android is that it&#039;ll be a cluttery wasteland of too many apps, that suck, obscuring the ones that don&#039;t. 

Plus it&#039;s not so open, since TMO locked out Skype/VOIP. so if each carrier is demanding their own version of Android, I see that potentially making it useless since you can only program to the baseline, or exclude certain customers.

I also agree that Apple needs to wake up. They&#039;re as &quot;Too closed&quot; as I think google might be &quot;Too open&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom,</p>
<p>I agree, though what&#8217;s funny, is that while Apple got their asses kicked by the PC. they certainly have come back, and not much has changed. They&#8217;re still pretty closed up, though their hardware is at least industry standard now. </p>
<p>My worry with Android is that it&#8217;ll be a cluttery wasteland of too many apps, that suck, obscuring the ones that don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Plus it&#8217;s not so open, since TMO locked out Skype/VOIP. so if each carrier is demanding their own version of Android, I see that potentially making it useless since you can only program to the baseline, or exclude certain customers.</p>
<p>I also agree that Apple needs to wake up. They&#8217;re as &quot;Too closed&quot; as I think google might be &quot;Too open&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Mollerus</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2008/09/effectiveui-does-android-change-the-game-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Mollerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwilker.com/j/index.cfm/2008/6/30/EffectiveUI-Does-Android-change-the-game-for-Apple#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Android should mean something to Apple. It&#039;s the same kind of threat that the PC posed to the Macintosh back in the 80&#039;s, where Apple had a closed, controlled, and more expensive computer system that lost major market share to a less-elegant but more open and affordable PC architecture (I&#039;m a Mac user, btw). I think that Android represents a major shift in the portable communications business model, and I think users will embrace it. It represents a completely open application platform, where users can choose their own hardware and software, and where communications, whether data or voice, will be a commodity service that you can change at will. Sounds like a personal computer with an Internet connection. It will be a portable personal computer with an Internet connection; just one that happens to be optimized to fit next to your head so that you can hear it and speak through it.  It&#039;s the logical next step, and Apple will have to react and adapt to stay in that market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android should mean something to Apple. It&#8217;s the same kind of threat that the PC posed to the Macintosh back in the 80&#8242;s, where Apple had a closed, controlled, and more expensive computer system that lost major market share to a less-elegant but more open and affordable PC architecture (I&#8217;m a Mac user, btw). I think that Android represents a major shift in the portable communications business model, and I think users will embrace it. It represents a completely open application platform, where users can choose their own hardware and software, and where communications, whether data or voice, will be a commodity service that you can change at will. Sounds like a personal computer with an Internet connection. It will be a portable personal computer with an Internet connection; just one that happens to be optimized to fit next to your head so that you can hear it and speak through it.  It&#8217;s the logical next step, and Apple will have to react and adapt to stay in that market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

