<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is why Journalists suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/</link>
	<description>John Wilker: Community, Code, Randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordSmyth</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-3725</link>
		<dc:creator>WordSmyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 05:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-3725</guid>
		<description>You have to spoon-feed them stuff because most journalists are not terribly well educated.  Even big cities are paying reporters $35,000 a year.  I can make more money being a local high school teacher.  TV stations and newspapers ought to be hiring people with diverse technical and educational backgrounds to properly report on a beat.  Instead, they don&#039;t, knowing that hiring someone with specialized knowledge in one area and specialized knowledge (and a competency) in journalism would be EXPENSIVE!  The old model of journalism from the dawn of television until probably the year 2000 or 2005 was to schmooze someone into thinking they&#039;d be super-awesome to have their stuff appear on a famous TV show.  That line of thinking does not apply at all anymore, but television station and newspaper owners don&#039;t understand that, because they grew up when times were different.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to spoon-feed them stuff because most journalists are not terribly well educated.  Even big cities are paying reporters $35,000 a year.  I can make more money being a local high school teacher.  TV stations and newspapers ought to be hiring people with diverse technical and educational backgrounds to properly report on a beat.  Instead, they don&#039;t, knowing that hiring someone with specialized knowledge in one area and specialized knowledge (and a competency) in journalism would be EXPENSIVE!  The old model of journalism from the dawn of television until probably the year 2000 or 2005 was to schmooze someone into thinking they&#039;d be super-awesome to have their stuff appear on a famous TV show.  That line of thinking does not apply at all anymore, but television station and newspaper owners don&#039;t understand that, because they grew up when times were different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>ha, thanks saurik! No worries. the news was definitely all you, and you deserve it 100%.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, thanks saurik! No worries. the news was definitely all you, and you deserve it 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Freeman (saurik)</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Freeman (saurik)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>For my part, I will say that I definitely made it clear to everyone I talked to that I was announcing the Cydia Store features at your conference ;P. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my part, I will say that I definitely made it clear to everyone I talked to that I was announcing the Cydia Store features at your conference ;P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot;  
  
Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch as was asking for a discount code so he could write about it.  
  
I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me.  
  
However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot;  </p>
<p>Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch as was asking for a discount code so he could write about it.  </p>
<p>I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me.  </p>
<p>However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot; 
 
Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch as was asking for a discount code so he could write about it. 
 
I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me. 
 
However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot; </p>
<p>Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch as was asking for a discount code so he could write about it. </p>
<p>I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me. </p>
<p>However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot;  
  
Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch and was asking for a discount code so he could write about it.  
  
I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me.  
  
However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out TechCrunch.  I could be mistaken, but here&#039;s the situation as it went down.  I&#039;m at the Silicon Valley iPhone meetup (led by Tim Burks).  I announce the show and it&#039;s incredibly low price.  A shout from the audience, &quot;Is there a TechCrunch discount?&quot;  To which I reply, &quot;No, tickets are priced low already.  There&#039;s not really room for discounts.&quot;  </p>
<p>Now, I thought the person was asking if there was a TechCrunch discount out there.  However, after relating the story, many pointed out that the guy was likely from TechCrunch and was asking for a discount code so he could write about it.  </p>
<p>I have no way of knowing which was true, but I certainly hope that TechCrunch is not that low. With holding news that your customers could use simply because no discount was giving seems shady to me.  </p>
<p>However, I&#039;m with you on the press front.  People keep saying they&#039;re lazy and don&#039;t want to work for a story.  You have to spoon feed them, etc.  I just can&#039;t believe that.  Maybe it&#039;s true though.  I&#039;d hope not, because if so, that&#039;s a sad statement on journalism as a practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeremy, Thanks for chiming in! I forwarded the email i sent. I would hope if it went to the wrong addy, the recipient would forward to the right one?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeremy, Thanks for chiming in! I forwarded the email i sent. I would hope if it went to the wrong addy, the recipient would forward to the right one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Horwitz</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Horwitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>John, one of my editors e-mailed me this link, and I can tell you that I never received an e-mail from you regarding this. Please send me a quick e-mail at jeremy (at) iLounge.com and let me know where you sent your request for coverage, so that I can determine what happened -- it&#039;s possible that your e-mail wasn&#039;t sent to the right address.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, one of my editors e-mailed me this link, and I can tell you that I never received an e-mail from you regarding this. Please send me a quick e-mail at jeremy (at) iLounge.com and let me know where you sent your request for coverage, so that I can determine what happened &#8212; it&#039;s possible that your e-mail wasn&#039;t sent to the right address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>Yeah, people like that annoy me to no end. You are working at a big time publication, ACT LIKE IT!  
 
You should block them from now on. It&#039;s their loss, not yours.  
 
Don&#039;t give up on all journalists though, there are a few of us left that actually care about journalistic integrity and doing silly things like including facts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, people like that annoy me to no end. You are working at a big time publication, ACT LIKE IT!  </p>
<p>You should block them from now on. It&#039;s their loss, not yours.  </p>
<p>Don&#039;t give up on all journalists though, there are a few of us left that actually care about journalistic integrity and doing silly things like including facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/03/this-is-why-journalists-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=722#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>True True, and I made sure to not say &quot;all&quot; journalists suck :) I suppose &quot;journalist&quot; is probably the wrong term in general for most of those sites, despite what they&#039;d like to think. 
 
I&#039;m especially annoyed with WSJ, and the reporter definitely earned a &quot;no thank you&quot; for her paper at future events. I mean, why give you a free pass if you can&#039;t be bothered to show the tiniest bit of love for the location of the news. It&#039;s not worth it to us. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True True, and I made sure to not say &quot;all&quot; journalists suck :) I suppose &quot;journalist&quot; is probably the wrong term in general for most of those sites, despite what they&#039;d like to think. </p>
<p>I&#039;m especially annoyed with WSJ, and the reporter definitely earned a &quot;no thank you&quot; for her paper at future events. I mean, why give you a free pass if you can&#039;t be bothered to show the tiniest bit of love for the location of the news. It&#039;s not worth it to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

