<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle needs an iTunes app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/</link>
	<description>John Wilker: Community, Code, Randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Sony beat Amazon to the desktop? &#124; johnwilker.com</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Sony beat Amazon to the desktop? &#124; johnwilker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=828#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>[...] won&#8217;t re-hash my thoughts on that, read them here. but according to Mobilereads, Sony might be the winner here, releasing their desktop library [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won&#8217;t re-hash my thoughts on that, read them here. but according to Mobilereads, Sony might be the winner here, releasing their desktop library [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Edgerly</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Edgerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=828#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>This really makes sense, and I hadn&#039;t thought this clearly about the lack of an iTunes-like organizing app for Kindle content.  kindle.amazon.com shows what might be possible.  And I agree on the phantom Apple Kindle Killer tablet.  I&#039;ll definitely get one, but I can&#039; believe it will replace my Kindle for long-form immersive reading, especially at the beach.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really makes sense, and I hadn&#039;t thought this clearly about the lack of an iTunes-like organizing app for Kindle content.  kindle.amazon.com shows what might be possible.  And I agree on the phantom Apple Kindle Killer tablet.  I&#039;ll definitely get one, but I can&#039; believe it will replace my Kindle for long-form immersive reading, especially at the beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=828#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>Yeah as much as I&#039;d bitch slap the Queen of England for a nice portable tablet running OS X, that was more user friendly than my old Nokia N800, I&#039;m not sold on reading on it.  
 
Battery life wouldn&#039;t be a HUGE deal except when I travel, since I&#039;m a OCD nut about plugging things in. Just in case teh zombie apocolypse comes and I only have half a charge.  
 
The screen will be the thing for me. I really can&#039;t read for long periods on backlit screens. the reflectivity, and harshness just mess me up. 
 
eInk has it&#039;s limitations, but for eBooks, it&#039;s spot on. 
 
You&#039;re right though, if Apple could lock in some distribution, brow beat the DRM thing out, and make it as seamless as music is now, Amazon better watch out. Their position isn&#039;t secure yet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah as much as I&#039;d bitch slap the Queen of England for a nice portable tablet running OS X, that was more user friendly than my old Nokia N800, I&#039;m not sold on reading on it.  </p>
<p>Battery life wouldn&#039;t be a HUGE deal except when I travel, since I&#039;m a OCD nut about plugging things in. Just in case teh zombie apocolypse comes and I only have half a charge.  </p>
<p>The screen will be the thing for me. I really can&#039;t read for long periods on backlit screens. the reflectivity, and harshness just mess me up. </p>
<p>eInk has it&#039;s limitations, but for eBooks, it&#039;s spot on. </p>
<p>You&#039;re right though, if Apple could lock in some distribution, brow beat the DRM thing out, and make it as seamless as music is now, Amazon better watch out. Their position isn&#039;t secure yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/05/the-kindle-needs-an-itunes-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=828#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>One has to wonder what the boys and girls in Cupertino will come out with on the rumored 7-10&quot; touchscreen tablet.... If Apple can lock up some publishing rights and deploy Books to their new table in glorious full color (and solve the battery issue) Apple could sew up the deal.   They already have the infrastructure, distribution mechanism, etc..   Then you could read AND listen to music, or watch movies, or TV etc....   But they would have to make it pretty darn light. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One has to wonder what the boys and girls in Cupertino will come out with on the rumored 7-10&quot; touchscreen tablet&#8230;. If Apple can lock up some publishing rights and deploy Books to their new table in glorious full color (and solve the battery issue) Apple could sew up the deal.   They already have the infrastructure, distribution mechanism, etc..   Then you could read AND listen to music, or watch movies, or TV etc&#8230;.   But they would have to make it pretty darn light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
