<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Again, we need a law to enforce &#8220;Don&#8217;t be a dick&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/2009/07/again-we-need-a-law-to-enforce-dont-be-a-dick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/07/again-we-need-a-law-to-enforce-dont-be-a-dick/</link>
	<description>Books, Community, Entrepreneurship, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Don&#39;t Be A Dick Being a Dick</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/07/again-we-need-a-law-to-enforce-dont-be-a-dick/comment-page-1/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Don&#39;t Be A Dick Being a Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=864#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>[...] agree with John Wilker on this subject, unfortunately those &quot;all about me&quot; folks are not limited to just the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agree with John Wilker on this subject, unfortunately those &quot;all about me&quot; folks are not limited to just the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/07/again-we-need-a-law-to-enforce-dont-be-a-dick/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=864#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post about dickheads that bring steamer trunks on a plane, stow them above others seats and generally act like dicks by not giving a poop about anyone else. I posted about this on my blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beingadick.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.beingadick.com&lt;/a&gt; with a link to your post. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post about dickheads that bring steamer trunks on a plane, stow them above others seats and generally act like dicks by not giving a poop about anyone else. I posted about this on my blog <a href="http://www.beingadick.com" target="_blank">http://www.beingadick.com</a> with a link to your post. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome Robot</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2009/07/again-we-need-a-law-to-enforce-dont-be-a-dick/comment-page-1/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=864#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>The main problem with checking your luggage is that there is no oversight on the people who rifle through your checked bags. Valuables are frequently stolen by security personnel. At least until recently when the airlines have been cracking down on theft. I&#039;m nervous to trust TSA employees with an expensive camera or game system when I know people who&#039;ve had DVD box sets ripped off. The chances seem to be low now, but traveling is nerve-wracking enough, and it&#039;s nice to know you have control over your possessions. Even forgetting theft, if you miss your connecting flight, you&#039;re stuck in one city while your things go on to your destination. Flying in the same clothes you flew in the day before is not pleasant! 
 
Of course, that means that when I travel, I take less stuff so I can carry it, or check at the gate for small planes. 
 
Now if we&#039;re talking about common sense, there&#039;s a lot that the TSA is required to do that flies in the face of it. The liquid ban is utterly backwards. The people who were arrested for trying that were found out through detective work, not through security screenings, and most chemists say their plan was not very realistic. It&#039;s more dangerous to deprive elderly people of water and infants of pumped breast milk. The &quot;Threat level is orange&quot; announcements need to stop. The threat level has been orange since the threat level color code has existed. It&#039;s meaningless. The expensive body screening machines that look through your clothes, and are used more often on attractive ladies than suspicious acting people need to go away. We should be spending that money training FBI agents so we have more detectives stopping plots before they get to the airport, especially since there&#039;s no evidence that airports are a particular target. Stadiums, malls, and churches are more vulnerable than airports, and just as &quot;good&quot; terror targets. We shouldn&#039;t have to deal with draconian TSA-like security in all public places. Or even at airports. You prevent terror attacks through detective work, and infiltration, not be treating your citizens like suspects. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem with checking your luggage is that there is no oversight on the people who rifle through your checked bags. Valuables are frequently stolen by security personnel. At least until recently when the airlines have been cracking down on theft. I&#039;m nervous to trust TSA employees with an expensive camera or game system when I know people who&#039;ve had DVD box sets ripped off. The chances seem to be low now, but traveling is nerve-wracking enough, and it&#039;s nice to know you have control over your possessions. Even forgetting theft, if you miss your connecting flight, you&#039;re stuck in one city while your things go on to your destination. Flying in the same clothes you flew in the day before is not pleasant! </p>
<p>Of course, that means that when I travel, I take less stuff so I can carry it, or check at the gate for small planes. </p>
<p>Now if we&#039;re talking about common sense, there&#039;s a lot that the TSA is required to do that flies in the face of it. The liquid ban is utterly backwards. The people who were arrested for trying that were found out through detective work, not through security screenings, and most chemists say their plan was not very realistic. It&#039;s more dangerous to deprive elderly people of water and infants of pumped breast milk. The &quot;Threat level is orange&quot; announcements need to stop. The threat level has been orange since the threat level color code has existed. It&#039;s meaningless. The expensive body screening machines that look through your clothes, and are used more often on attractive ladies than suspicious acting people need to go away. We should be spending that money training FBI agents so we have more detectives stopping plots before they get to the airport, especially since there&#039;s no evidence that airports are a particular target. Stadiums, malls, and churches are more vulnerable than airports, and just as &quot;good&quot; terror targets. We shouldn&#039;t have to deal with draconian TSA-like security in all public places. Or even at airports. You prevent terror attacks through detective work, and infiltration, not be treating your citizens like suspects. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

