<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>johnwilker.com &#187; Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/category/Mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com</link>
	<description>John Wilker: Community, Code, Randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How does iThoughtsHD have this and Apple doesn&#8217;t?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/how-does-ithoughtshd-have-this-and-apple-doesnt/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/how-does-ithoughtshd-have-this-and-apple-doesnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignite Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I caved, and paid $10 for pages. Complete waste of money. I edit a lot of pages files. Sponsor packets,etc. All the time. I'd love to pull one up on my iPad, edit, and without having to think about plugging into iTunes, copying the files out of iTunes back to my iDisk where they live, overwriting the old one.

Pages, and most apps, come kinda close, you can access the file, pull it in locally, make edits, but then you're stuck, the document is trapped in the iPad and iTunes. 

Why not make the iPad apps (at least the Apple ones) more connected to Oh I dunno, say Apple's own cloud services. iWork.com and mobileMe. Some of us (still) pay for mobileMe hoping it'll mature and actually be useful. I have no idea what iWork.com is for, but it seems like it'd make perfect sense to tie the iWork iPad apps (maybe the new iLife ones too) to Apple's own (though dropbox, et. al. would be nice too) services to extend their usefulness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my biggest complaints with the iPad is it&#8217;s complete lack of usefulness for content creators. I understand, creators are not Apple&#8217;s biggest market, or even a group the ever seem to care about, Shoot, they make &#8220;Consumer electronics&#8221; LOL.</p>
<p>Still there&#8217;s so little that would have to be done to make the iPad SO incredibly awesome for creators, and open doors left and right. I know it&#8217;s possible, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=T*EZjCprqmc&amp;subid=&amp;offerid=146261.1&amp;type=10&amp;tmpid=3909&amp;RD_PARM1=http%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fus%2Fapp%2Fithoughtshd-mindmapping%2Fid369020033%3Fmt%3D8" target="_blank">iThoughtsHD</a> (iTunes Link), a great mind mapping app has already done it!</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0008.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1142" title="IMG_0008" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0008-300x225.png" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>When building a mind map, like many tools on the iPad, you can save off to the cloud somewhere, box.net, dropbox,etc. Unlike many apps, and all Apple apps. You can load from cloud.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that easy. They did why didn&#8217;t/hasn&#8217;t Apple?</p>
<p>I caved, and paid $10 for <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=T*EZjCprqmc&amp;subid=&amp;offerid=146261.1&amp;type=10&amp;tmpid=3909&amp;RD_PARM1=http%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fus%2Fapp%2Fpages%2Fid361309726%3Fmt%3D8" target="_blank">Pages</a>. Complete waste of money. I edit a lot of pages files. Sponsor packets,etc. All the time. I&#8217;d love to pull one up on my iPad, edit, and without having to think about plugging into iTunes, copying the files out of iTunes back to my iDisk where they live, overwriting the old one.</p>
<p>Pages, and most apps, come kinda close, you can access the file, pull it in locally, make edits, but then you&#8217;re stuck, the document is trapped in the iPad and iTunes.</p>
<p>Why not make the iPad apps (at least the Apple ones) more connected to Oh I dunno, say Apple&#8217;s own cloud services. iWork.com and mobileMe. Some of us (still) pay for mobileMe hoping it&#8217;ll mature and actually be useful. I have no idea what iWork.com is for, but it seems like it&#8217;d make perfect sense to tie the iWork iPad apps (maybe the new iLife ones too) to Apple&#8217;s own (though dropbox, et. al. would be nice too) services to extend their usefulness.</p>
<p>Please Apple here my plea! The iPad is great for games and consumer shit, hook those of us who create up! It can&#8217;t be hard, a third party did it! You can too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/how-does-ithoughtshd-have-this-and-apple-doesnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hulu +, Not the Droids I was looking for</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/hulu-not-the-droids-i-was-looking-for/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/hulu-not-the-droids-i-was-looking-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope for many, hulu + is a huge WIN. For me, in the short term, it&#8217;s not. When I heard the announcement, my first thought was, &#8220;ok this is the final nail in Cable&#8217;s coffin for our house&#8221; Very quickly though the coffin shrugged the nail off. What would make hulu + the killer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-30-at-8.56.50-AM.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1129" title="Screen shot 2010-06-30 at 8.56.50 AM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-30-at-8.56.50-AM.png" alt="" width="364" height="121" /></a>I hope for many, <a href="http://www.hulu.com/plus" target="_blank">hulu +</a> is a huge WIN. For me, in the short term, it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>When I heard the announcement, my first thought was, &#8220;ok this is the final nail in Cable&#8217;s coffin for our house&#8221;</p>
<p>Very quickly though the coffin shrugged the nail off.</p>
<p>What would make hulu + the killer app for me? Not a lot above what they&#8217;re offering, but enough that I&#8217;ll be waiting before switching our family over.</p>
<p>1. <strong>The Archive</strong>. That&#8217;s a nice feature. Nicole decided to watch Angel, yet currently hulu only has like 1 season, or part of 1 season. So when we find programs we&#8217;d like to explore from the beginning, the archive is a good option, assuming the show is in there.</p>
<p>2. We watch a lot of <strong>Discovery and History channel</strong>, which don&#8217;t seem to be available on hulu. Bummer, will have to wait and see if they get that content or if there&#8217;s another avenue for it&#8217;s consumption.</p>
<p>3. <strong>iPad and iPhone apps</strong> are awesome (and the quality is insane!), but much like the Netflix app, when I&#8217;m in the mood to use those apps is when I&#8217;m traveling. hulu and Netflix really should allow the apps to cache content. It&#8217;s all DRM protected by the apps, etc, so caching shouldn&#8217;t be an issue. Putting in hard restrictions shouldn&#8217;t be hard either, like 3 shows, for 2 days, etc. Frankly when I&#8217;m at home wanting to watch something I have a really big TV with Netflix and hulu on it, I&#8217;m not reaching for my iPad.</p>
<p>Sure if I&#8217;m in a hotel room, I could stream content and watch on my iPad, and that&#8217;s a valid example and a use I&#8217;d likely engage in, but for me, and I assume a lot of other travelers, the bigger need is in the air. Unfortunately I don&#8217;t see Frontier adding in flight wifi anytime soon, and when they do it&#8217;ll be too expensive. Plus if <a href="http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/" target="_blank">Wil</a>&#8216;s experience is an indicator, as more and more people start to stream content, inflight wifi is likely to break down. I suspect it&#8217;s not that fat of a pipe to begin with.<a href="http://twitter.com/wilw/status/17365939292" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1128" title="Screen shot 2010-06-30 at 8.48.08 AM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Screen-shot-2010-06-30-at-8.48.08-AM.png" alt="" width="362" height="100" /></a></p>
<p>4. This is kind of a &#8220;good to have&#8221; it sounds as if hulu plus doesn&#8217;t <strong>reduce the number of ads I have to see</strong>. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, i pay for cable, and without TiVo I&#8217;d see far more ads than on hulu, but it feels weird to move to a premium model, and not at least reduce the number of ads + users will see. Shoot, just go from 3-4 to 2-3 during a show. Something to make me feel like my $10 is buying something more than archive access.</p>
<p>I think the reason hulu + wasn&#8217;t a home run for me is because we&#8217;re fairly casual watchers. Access to the archive, while nice isn&#8217;t huge for us. We have a small number of shows we watch on hulu and we&#8217;re pretty good at watching them before they expire. The lack of caching content for air travel, or say, camping or other off the grid activities, makes hulu + even less interesting. I have a ton of content in the &#8220;videos&#8221; app on my iPad, it&#8217;s available whenever, whereever. hulu + didn&#8217;t come close enough to beating that for me.</p>
<p>I hope as they roll the service out, they add some features. I really do want to support hulu and stop paying for cable service, but that doesn&#8217;t appear to be today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/hulu-not-the-droids-i-was-looking-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So the ATT caps don&#8217;t affect you huh?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching all the tweets about &#8220;looks like I only use 400mb so AT&#38;T&#8217;s new caps won&#8217;t affect me.&#8221; earlier this week, and got to thinking. I&#8217;m wondering how much all these folks are considering the future. Not 2044 when we have iPhones in our heads, but a 2 months from now, maybe 3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching all the tweets about &#8220;looks like I only use 400mb so AT&amp;T&#8217;s new caps won&#8217;t affect me.&#8221; earlier this week, and got to thinking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering how much all these folks are considering the future. Not 2044 when we have iPhones in our heads, but a 2 months from now, maybe 3. Clearly AT&amp;T had a plan beyond &#8220;Making data plans more affordable and available for all. 98% of our users don&#8217;t even use close to 2g&#8221; and all. I mean we&#8217;ve met AT&amp;T right? When have they done something for their customers, beyond send <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/atandt-warns-customer-that-emailing-the-ceo-will-result-in-a-cease/" target="_blank">cease and desist letters when we email them</a>.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m wondering..</p>
<p>Skype on 3G&#8230; how much are we gonna use that? How much will that impact data use? I can see 2gb going fast with a couple business calls a week.</p>
<p>Front facing camera and some sort of iChat for iPhone&#8230; Will we get it? Who knows, rumors (again) say yes. How much will video chatting use up your data use?</p>
<p>Backgrounding of Pandora? How much data do you think you&#8217;ll use streaming pandora at work every day? On your jog? at the gym? at your desk?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot (possibly) coming soon that will hugely impact data usage. Surprised AT&amp;T pre-empted all that with a change in rates?</p>
<p>A change that by next week we&#8217;ll have mostly forgotten in the euphoria of a steve-note, new devices, and mac pros, and robot unicorns. AT&amp;T for their cluelessness in dealing with customers, isn&#8217;t stupid, and they just roped a ton of schmoes into very restrictive plans.</p>
<p>Take a long the view&#8230; it&#8217;s a different picture. I&#8217;ll be keeping my unlimited plan thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dropbox as Anecdotal evidence of Mobile platform strength?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was cruising around the dropbox blog and saw that they have a public voting site for feature requests. As I scrolled through the list, I noticed the mobile device requests.

It pretty much supports my assumptions on the mobile platform space right now.



iPhone, iPad, and Android are all already supported, WinMo (unclear, but I assume phone 7, but it was 6 months ago) is the next highest demanded platform, by a large margin. Pre and Crackberry bring up the final two spots. 

Sure it's anecdotal, but I can't help but wonder if dropbox doesn't serve as a microcosm of the mobile space? Clearly with their business on the line dropbox is pursuing the most demanded platforms first, sorry Pre folks, I know you love your phones, but you bet a lame horse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-28-at-7.35.39-AM.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1115" title="Screen shot 2010-05-28 at 7.35.39 AM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-28-at-7.35.39-AM-300x245.png" alt="" width="300" height="245" /></a>I was cruising around the <a href="http://blog.dropbox.com/" target="_blank">dropbox blog</a> and saw that they have a public <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/votebox" target="_blank">voting site</a> for feature requests. As I scrolled through the list, I noticed the mobile device requests.</p>
<p>It pretty much supports my assumptions on the mobile platform space right now.</p>
<p>iPhone, iPad, and Android are all already supported, WinMo (unclear, but I assume phone 7, but it was 6 months ago) is the next highest demanded platform, by a large margin. Pre and Crackberry bring up the final two spots.</p>
<p>Sure it&#8217;s anecdotal, but I can&#8217;t help but wonder if dropbox doesn&#8217;t serve as a microcosm of the mobile space? Clearly with their business on the line dropbox is pursuing the most demanded platforms first, sorry Pre folks, I know you love your phones, but you bet a lame horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon and Publishing are killing eBooks with 1000 cuts.</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/amazon-and-publishing-are-killing-ebooks-with-1000-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/amazon-and-publishing-are-killing-ebooks-with-1000-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Kindle, which I love and carry with me everywhere I'm likely to be reading, is dying. It's dying a slow death from a thousand cuts. I used to buy a new eBook from Amazon almost weekly. Sometimes I'd buy 3-4 at a time to have at the ready. Now I look thru the $0.00 section, and the $.99 self publish section (Shout out to Christian Cantrell. Go read his stuff. Yes, that Christian Cantrell from Adobe, LOL)

Looking at these screen shots, what incentive is there for me to buy the eBook version. Bear in mind, I have free shipping with Amazon prime. Though even with shipping, if I wasn't in a hurry, regular shipping doesn't cost much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Kindle, which I love and carry with me everywhere I&#8217;m likely to be reading, is dying. It&#8217;s dying a slow death from a thousand cuts. I used to buy a new eBook from Amazon almost weekly. Sometimes I&#8217;d buy 3-4 at a time to have at the ready. Now I look thru the $0.00 section, and the $.99 self publish section (Shout out to Christian Cantrell. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?_encoding=UTF8&amp;search-alias=digital-text&amp;field-author=Christian%20Cantrell" target="_blank">Go read his stuff</a>. Yes, that Christian Cantrell from Adobe, LOL. He writes awesome Sci Fi Short stories)</p>
<p>Looking at these screen shots, what incentive is there for me to buy the eBook version. Bear in mind, I have free shipping with Amazon prime. Though even with shipping, if I wasn&#8217;t in a hurry, regular shipping doesn&#8217;t cost much, and is often free if I&#8217;m in no hurry.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-04-at-2.45.05-PM.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1107" title="Screen shot 2010-05-04 at 2.45.05 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-04-at-2.45.05-PM-300x122.png" alt="" width="300" height="122" /></a></p>
<p>So really where&#8217;s the benefit of buying an eBook? Less than $3 dollars savings? Really? Over a paperback in two cases?! The middle book isn&#8217;t released yet, should we guess how it&#8217;s paperback price will look compared to the Kindle price?</p>
<p>This is such a huge fail, and it&#8217;s Amazon, and the Publishing Industries&#8217; to share.  They&#8217;ve both taken what was IMO a promising start to revolutionizing publishing, and forced it back into 1980.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1108" title="Screen shot 2010-05-04 at 2.48.23 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-04-at-2.48.23-PM.png" alt="" width="279" height="125" /></p>
<p>I know Amazon lost (way to stick to your guns and fight for your customers) and caved to the publishers, but now rather than use their new found power (i&#8217;m talking about the publishing companies) to find a reasonable balance in price and deliverable, they&#8217;ve run the price right back up to where it makes no sense at all for the consumer.</p>
<p>It feels like they&#8217;re trying to kill ebooks, by making them not worth the price. Way to be green publishers.</p>
<p>Green? Yeah green. By making eBooks so unattractively priced, the Publishing industry in encouraging our continued attack on the environment. Maybe they hope earth will choke on green house gasses before they have to come to terms with technology and the changing landscape of publishing? If we&#8217;re all too busy gasping for air, we won&#8217;t notice that books are to blame. (Yes that&#8217;s over the top, but illustrated my point)</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1107" title="Screen shot 2010-05-04 at 2.45.05 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-04-at-2.45.05-PM-300x122.png" alt="" width="300" height="122" /></p>
<p>On top of this completely retarded pricing, that more or less incentivizes me to purchase a dead tree copy of all three books, each eBook is DRM&#8217;ed. Each of these are listed with Text-Speach disabled. So not only am I paying an outrageous price for my eBook, but the publishers are telling me to fuck off, I get no actual features that make an eBook great. And of course, I can&#8217;t use the eVersion outside the kindle.</p>
<p>So I pay pretty much the same price for paper or eBook. Yet with paper I can sell the book to a used book store, loan it to n number of friends, give it away, keep it for the next 30 years, etc. Where as with the Kindle version (this is aimed at you completely Amazon) I can&#8217;t loan it out, I can&#8217;t sell it, I can&#8217;t gift it, I can&#8217;t have my Kindle read it to me while I fold clothes, and should the Kindle platform die, I can&#8217;t even re-read it. Where&#8217;s the incentive in buying the eBook version?</p>
<p>Amazon, you came so close to crushing it. Really, you were right there. the Nook, sucks, IMO. Most of the other craptastic devices being crapped out every other day, by mostly no name vendors stand no chance at ever being anything more than Marginal. You were the market leader. Now&#8230; my Kindle is full of things I&#8217;ve downloaded off the web. Not pirated content, tho that&#8217;s an option, but content i can get from free from sites like <a href="http://www.instapaper.com/" target="_blank">instapaper</a>, the <a href="http://calibre-ebook.com/" target="_blank">Calibre desktop app</a>, etc.</p>
<p>Sorry Amazon, I&#8217;m not giving you or these lame ass publishers money. It only encourages this terrible anti-consumer behavior. One of both of you will learn, and it appears it&#8217;s gonna have to be the hard way, for you and consumers. Way to go.</p>
<p>Authors; Tery Brooks, John Scalzi, George RR Martin, Jessica Livingston, John Birmingham, et. al. Stand up, you&#8217;re impacted just as much as consumers. It&#8217;s not 1980 any more, times change, help your publishers figure that out. If I could pay you all directly, for an open, DRM-free eBook file, I&#8217;d do it in a heartbeat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/amazon-and-publishing-are-killing-ebooks-with-1000-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe needs to buy Palm.</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe MAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picture this.

Adobe buys Palm. Retools WebOS (or goes android, but I think that's a bad idea) to be more Flash focused. Basically create a "Flash Phone" Build out a marketplace, somewhere between Draconian Apple, and Hippy-free-for-all Google, for Flash devs to build and sell their apps. SELL. Adobe, you build the market, and back out. Don't start building your own things and giving them away for free. That screws your community over, cut it out!

Flash Devs have been denied a reliable, useful marketplace... well pretty much forever. Companies like Litl are working on devices to show how awesome Flash apps (Channels) can be, and hopefully help developers make money too. Adobe could easily kill some of their soon-to-be-dead-but-no-one-knows-it-yet projects, and focus on a mobile SDK for Devs to build stand alone "apps" that the "Flash Phone" could run. 

Apps that exist as good citizens, outside a browser, as a standalone executable/process. They kill when closed, and don't burn through the CPU. This is totally possible!

I know I'd buy a Flash Phone (assuming it's the Pre aka nice hardware) in a heartbeat. I'd want to support the community, but I also think it's a huge untapped market. Look at the flash content out there on the web! So much could easily become apps. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>To screw Apple. It&#8217;s clear that no matter how much, begging, suing (this is a bad idea anyways), cajoling, &#8220;I&#8217;m with Adobe&#8221;ing, etc, takes place, Apple has given the one finger salute to Adobe. That&#8217;s that. It&#8217;s their phone, there&#8217;s lots of other handsets for Adobe to play with.</p>
<p>Frankly, as much as I&#8217;d love to have Flash on my iPad (not my iPhone though) it&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s call. I don&#8217;t agree, but since they don&#8217;t call me to ask my opinion, I assume they don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p><strong>Palm is for sale</strong>. The Pre is a nice phone, it&#8217;s actually frakkin sexy, I dig it. WebOS, isn&#8217;t that bad either. If Palm had 1. not gone with Verizon, and 2. listenned to their developer community, and 3. not been retards about brand/marketing/and reach, the Pre would be a huge hit. Instead, <strong>Palm is for sale</strong>.</p>
<p>Picture this.</p>
<p>Adobe buys Palm. Retools WebOS (or goes android, but I think that&#8217;s a bad idea) to be more Flash focused. Basically create a &#8220;Flash Phone&#8221; Build out a marketplace, somewhere between Draconian Apple, and Hippy-free-for-all Google, for Flash devs to build and sell their apps. SELL. Adobe, you build the market, and back out. Don&#8217;t start building your own things and giving them away for free. That screws your community over, cut it out!</p>
<p>Flash Devs have been denied a reliable, useful marketplace&#8230; well pretty much forever. Companies like <a href="http://litl.com/" target="_blank">Litl</a> are working on devices to show how awesome Flash apps (Channels) can be, and hopefully help developers make money too. Adobe could easily kill some of their soon-to-be-dead-but-no-one-knows-it-yet projects, and focus on a mobile SDK for Devs to build stand alone &#8220;apps&#8221; that the &#8220;Flash Phone&#8221; could run.</p>
<p>Apps that exist as good citizens, outside a browser, as a standalone executable/process. They kill when closed, and don&#8217;t burn through the CPU. This is totally possible!</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;d buy a Flash Phone (assuming it&#8217;s the Pre aka nice hardware) in a heartbeat. I&#8217;d want to support the community, but I also think it&#8217;s a huge untapped market. Look at the flash content out there on the web! So much could easily become apps.</p>
<p><strong>Flash Devs need to stop giving everything away in the hope of attracting consulting business! Build things people will pay for, and sell them! You guys are your own worst enemy! You&#8217;re not helping the community!</strong></p>
<p>So Adobe, if you&#8217;re reading this, I know hardware isn&#8217;t your thing, but hey, consumer electronics wasn&#8217;t Apple&#8217;s when they launched the iPod (hardware still was, I know, it&#8217;s an imperfect comparison), and they&#8217;ve pretty much crushed that market now. You need to give up on the iPhone, yeah I know it&#8217;s the pits, but rather than waste time suing, being snarky on stage at MAX, and building hacky work arounds in Flash Pro, move on. You&#8217;re bigger than this &#8220;Let me in! Let me in!&#8221; nonsense. I want Adobe to shine, and rock the house! I want Adobe to do what it does best! Innovate! Build tools that let developers do mind blowing things! Now&#8230; Provide hardware for those mind blowing things to live on!</p>
<p>Ok that&#8217;s it! What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad&#8230;.. nice but not magical, yet (my Review)</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I'm writing this on my iPad. I'm not feeling the magic. (update, i had to save it so I could edit on my Macbook, else this post take would've taken 40 years to write)

Don't get me wrong, it's pretty, but not useful. Yet.

And before you decide I'm just an Apple hater, let me lay out my credentials for those that don't know me.

I own:

Unibody Macbook, 2 Minis, 3 iPods (including an iPod Photo), 2 iPhones, 1 iPad, 2 Airport Express, 1 Airport Extreme, my wife has a white plastic macbook.

I've Previously owned:

a Macbook Pro, Newton 110, Powerbook 510, Performa.  I think it's safe to say my fanboi-ness is secure.

That out of the way.

The iPad is a very pretty device, and if your life (as some do) revolves around reading websites, watching videos, and .... well that's it. Checking email I suppose too. Then the iPad is the perfect toy for you (albeit, for those simple tasks, the price IMO is a bit steep).

I tried. I didn't write this review the night i got my iPad, I didn't write it Sunday night, I waited and actually tried to do things I'd normally grab my Macbook for.

First I went up on my deck, to get some sun, and enjoy working outside. Since I was just gonna reply to a few emails, I grabbed the iPad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m writing this on my iPad. I&#8217;m not feeling the magic. (update, i had to save it so I could edit on my Macbook, else this post take would&#8217;ve taken 40 years to write)</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it&#8217;s pretty, but not useful. Yet.</p>
<p>And before you decide I&#8217;m just an Apple hater, let me lay out my credentials for those that don&#8217;t know me.</p>
<p><strong>I own:</strong></p>
<p>Unibody Macbook, 2 Minis, 3 iPods (including an iPod Photo), 2 iPhones, 1 iPad, 2 Airport Express, 1 Airport Extreme, my wife has a white plastic macbook.</p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;ve Previously owned:</strong></p>
<p>a Macbook Pro, Newton 110, Powerbook 510, Performa.  I think it&#8217;s safe to say my fanboi-ness is secure.</p>
<p><strong>That out of the way.</strong></p>
<p>The iPad is a very pretty device, and if your life (as some do) revolves around reading websites, watching videos, and &#8230;. well that&#8217;s it. Checking email I suppose too. Then the iPad is the perfect toy for you (albeit, for those simple tasks, the price IMO is a bit steep).</p>
<p>I tried. I didn&#8217;t write this review the night i got my iPad, I didn&#8217;t write it Sunday night, I waited and actually tried to do things I&#8217;d normally grab my Macbook for.</p>
<p>First I went up on my deck, to get some sun, and enjoy working outside. Since I was just gonna reply to a few emails, I grabbed the iPad.</p>
<ul>
<li>While I enjoy seeing myself, i don&#8217;t want to watch my face as I type emails. That&#8217;s easily fixable though, so it&#8217;s not a knock. Why Apple is obsessed with uselessly glossy screens is beyond me.</li>
<li>First I tried holding it and typing with my thumbs. I prefer landscape mode, and have locked it in that orientation. I have big hands, so it&#8217;s quite possible, but not a long term thing. Then I set it in my lap, as many have proclaimed is the perfect use case&#8230; I got a sore neck. By this time I&#8217;d responded (lengthy responses sure) to two emails. Perhaps if I invested in a $40 (?) case from Apple that i could sit on our patio table, and use? Or buy a Bluetooth keyboard?</li>
<li>One email I needed to send an export of attendee data to. I couldn&#8217;t. The export is .xls of CSV. kudos to Mobile Safari for opening the .xls and showing me, but I needed to send it to some one. Sure the iPhone doesn&#8217;t support this, but if the iPad is a revolutionary bridge device between my iPhone and a laptop, I expect a few laptop like things to be there.</li>
<li>Of course since I can&#8217;t run two things at once, I had to close out mail.app mid compose to look up a discount code for a sponsor. Close mail, open safari, go to eventbrite, copy the code, close safari, open mail.app</li>
<li>Then I thought I&#8217;d take a break, check on my <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/we-rule-for-ipad/id361536763?mt=8" target="_blank">Kingdom</a> and my <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/godfinger-for-ipad/id361431917?mt=8" target="_blank">weird little people on Planet Wilker</a>. Thankfully the display is so crisp and bright, it overpowers (mostly) the sun, so i could actually enjoy those games.</li>
</ul>
<p>Last night I went to a user group meeting, taking only my Mifi and my iPad.</p>
<ul>
<li>The auto brightness doesn&#8217;t seem very responsive, so I was routinely blinded when loading something with a white screen in the darkened room. No biggy really, annoying a little, sure, but not a &#8220;Damn you Apple&#8221;</li>
<li>I had two tasks I was hoping to get done, or at least get started, while listening to the presentation. Write an email to attendees of 360|iDev (thru eventbrite.com&#8217;s email feature), and compose the last speaker email to speakers at 360|iDev using mailchimp. The result. FAIL. Both websites use HTML based text editors, apparently not the html web that Apple supports. Kinda crappy. Can&#8217;t use Flash, can&#8217;t use some HTML&#8230;</li>
<li>So I spent the UG meeting, not using my iPad except to occasionally tweet, and that was only because my iPhone was in my pocket</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to replace some of the things I do on my iPhone and my laptop</p>
<ul>
<li>I completely understand why Apple made the iPad support iPhone apps. It&#8217;s nice to launch and crow about 100k + apps. I have yet to use an iPhone app on the iPad that wasn&#8217;t completely and utterly fail. Why use it in 1x mode? I&#8217;ll just fire up my iPhone. In 2x mode, no app escapes the ugly tree. I understand the logic, but think Apple should have given developers more time to get their apps ready. I mean really, no facebook app? Hell, the mobileMe app&#8230; uh Apple. I know you want me to shell out $30 for the iWorks, but I&#8217;d love to be able to access my mobileMe account in a native iPad app, how about that?</li>
<li>I think the iPad will be much more interesting 3 months from now. Now that developers have an actual device to test with, those that (I can&#8217;t blame them) waited to actually use the device before building apps for it, will begin releasing apps. Right now the iPad app store is woe-fully anemic&#8230; well maybe not if you&#8217;re independently wealthy, and can afford every $9.99 app, LOL. Even then, there&#8217;s only a small list of apps I&#8217;m buying later, as I feel richer. Most of the apps I want, aren&#8217;t there.</li>
</ul>
<p>Yeah Apple is about the experience, I agree, and sure surfing the web is very nice, if you only want to surf the web and consume. If you actually want to create&#8230; well so far the iPad hasn&#8217;t done much to support creation. I read one review that gushed and gushed about how awesome surfing the web is. OK sure, but I don&#8217;t spend my day complaining about surfing the web now.</p>
<p><strong>So what do I like?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The feel of it. It&#8217;s a nice piece of equipment. The screen (once covered in a smudge/glare free cover) is awesome. Sure I&#8217;d like to not have letterboxing when I watch a movie but whatever, that&#8217;s a first world problem, and not that important to me.</li>
<li>The OS, it&#8217;s the iPhone OS, which while I wish wasn&#8217;t so closed off, and anti-hacker (Pro user), it&#8217;s an easy OS to understand.</li>
<li>The Apps. iPad apps, are nice. They use the screen really well. Those that will shine are the ones that didn&#8217;t simply recompile for the larger device.</li>
<li>The future potential. The iPad right now, for me is a cute toy that gets attention, and let&#8217;s me play a few games, and waste time. The iPad in 6 months, could seriously kick ass. There will be more apps that are useful, there will be (Please Apple, it&#8217;s kinda obvious) some way for me to work on files in mobileMe (or Googledocs) over the cloud. Screw this dragging files into iTunes, and back and forth. It&#8217;s 2010 Apple, you have a cloud storage service, that people are paying money for now. Tie that in to your devices!</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What don&#8217;t I like?</strong> (and please, you don&#8217;t have to agree, I welcome your opinion, but if Apple makes you happy with what they deliver, don&#8217;t try to tell me what I should be happy too)</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s a bit heavy. Not really a &#8220;Bad mark&#8221; but it&#8217;s not light.</li>
<li>The video app needs an update. Looking at my movies, it&#8217;s fine to see the thumbnail and name. Looking at TV shows. A thumbnail from an episode, isn&#8217;t helpful. I had 6 icons. Some Seinfeld, some Big Bang Theory. No labels. I had to open one up to see that it was the folder for a season of that show. I like the breakdown by season, that&#8217;s nice, but not having any visible clue, it&#8217;s like hunting around to find the show you want to watch.</li>
<li>The single port. This is totally an Apple thing, and I wasn&#8217;t surprised, that they&#8217;d only have a dock connector, and sell $29 things that plug into the dock connector. Doesn&#8217;t mean I think it&#8217;s ok.</li>
<li>The lack of Flash. I don&#8217;t actually miss Flash THAT much, because I&#8217;ve had my iPhone for a while. I think flash on the iPhone isn&#8217;t really a deal breaker. But the iPad is another device entirely. I expect on a media consumption tablet, that I could hit up Hulu, or youtube (fuck having a separate app, that&#8217;s lame), or any of the what? 80% of the web that uses flash to deliver content. It&#8217;s a business play pure and simple, and as a business person, I can&#8217;t find fault. As a consumer, hacker, and person who tries to see thru bull shit, I think it&#8217;s weak sauce. &#8220;Open Web&#8221;, my ass, it&#8217;s the &#8220;Apple Web&#8221;, and them trying to come off like it&#8217;s anything but a power grab, is disingenuous at best.</li>
<li>the iPad of now. If <a href="http://360idev.com">360|iDev</a> wasn&#8217;t the weak after iPadmas, I probably would have waited. It just doesn&#8217;t do anything I can&#8217;t do now with the tools I have. I don&#8217;t need &#8220;an semi-adequate alternative&#8221; I need a &#8220;solid replacement&#8221;&#8230; the iPad isn&#8217;t there.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why my iPad is coming 4/3 not &#8216;late April&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading My friend Steve's post over at TUAW on the subject and most of his reasons (most of them) resonated with me. Enough so that I wanted to go into more details on my own.

Simple timing. 360&#124;iDev starts 4/11. I think it makes sense to have an iPad and play with one before and during the conference. To not would be like running an iPhone conference and not having an iPhone (or iPod touch). So it just made sense not to wait. 
wifi. Before I had my iPhone I had my iPod touch and carried it everywhere. Unlike Steve I travel in places with either no free wifi, or shitty free wifi. BUT, i have an iPhone now. So my iPad doesn't need that constant connection to the net. It'd be nice, of course, I want every device I own connected to the net. But for what I imagine my main use case to be (reading email on the couch, playing a game, or something else domestic like that) I'll be at home on my home internet. Plus But when that connection is thru AT&#038;T.... See 3. Then 4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading My friend Steve&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/25/4-reasons-im-not-waiting-for-a-3g-ipad/" target="_blank">post over at TUAW</a> on the subject and most of his reasons (most of them) resonated with me. Enough so that I wanted to go into more details on my own.</p>
<ol>
<li>Simple timing. <a href="http://360idev.com" target="_blank">360|iDev</a> starts 4/11. I think it makes sense to have an iPad and play with one before and during the conference. To not would be like running an iPhone conference and not having an iPhone (or iPod touch). So it just made sense not to wait.</li>
<li>wifi. Before I had my iPhone I had my iPod touch and carried it everywhere. Unlike Steve I travel in places with either no free wifi, or shitty free wifi. BUT, i have an iPhone now. So my iPad doesn&#8217;t need that constant connection to the net. It&#8217;d be nice, of course, I want every device I own connected to the net. But for what I imagine my main use case to be (reading email on the couch, playing a game, or something else domestic like that) I&#8217;ll be at home on my home internet. Plus But when that connection is thru AT&amp;T&#8230;. See 3. Then 4.</li>
<li>AT&amp;T. I truly hate AT&amp;T. I&#8217;m sure they know it, I&#8217;m equally sure I&#8217;m not alone. I can&#8217;t think of another company that has worked so hard at being teh suck. I mean you have millions of customers essentially gifted to you. You didn&#8217;t earn them, or even have to market to them to lure them to you. Steve Jobs handed you millions of new users. And you failed. AT&amp;Ts network is the suck, it&#8217;s terrible. I live in Denver, and now that Spring is coming, and the Rockies home opener is only 3 weeks away, I&#8217;m planning to have a useless iPhone. Every home game saturates what I assume is the single tower in LoDo, and while I have full bars, I have no network. So why would I want another device on such a craptastic network? Makes no sense.</li>
<li>Sprint MiFi. I love having a 5 user portable hotspot in my pocket (that&#8217;s what she said?) that essentially gives me AT&amp;T immunity. I can use my iPhone, soon (I think) I&#8217;ll be able to make skype calls if I really need to, etc. So when there&#8217;s no wifi for my iPad, and when the Rockies are in town, I&#8217;m still able to function like an affluent american in 2010. Fuck you AT&amp;T. (Note to sprint, the connection speeds on my Mifi suck! 3g? at .57 Mbits I don&#8217;t agree)</li>
<li>Ok with moo&#8217;ing. If you owned a first gen MacBook Pro, you know what I mean. Thankfully mine never moo&#8217;ed, and my MacBook AIR&#8217;s weird CPU throttling was handled by a hack until Apple released a fix. I know what I&#8217;m getting into and am ok with that. iPad V1 will be a vastly different creature than the 3GS equivalent (the model 3 years from now). That&#8217;s fine, I can live with that because 6.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m gonna jailbreak that bitch! You heard me! The moment the <a href="http://blog.iphone-dev.org/" target="_blank">dev team</a> (you guys are gonna work on it right?) release the JB, I&#8217;m on it. I love the freedom my iPhone 2G has to be customized, and do what I want it to do (Skype calls now, ha!). The primary reason my 3GS isn&#8217;t JB&#8217;ed is that it experienced a weird battery drain so I put it back in jail, I can&#8217;t have my primary mobile computer/phone be dead batteried in 3 hours. My iPad on the other hand, will never be mission critical, so it&#8217;s getting JB&#8217;ed ASAP. I think the true awesomeness (as usual) will be experienced by iPad owners who break free of Apple.</li>
</ol>
<p>So those are my reasons for ordering an iPad. As a consumer, it&#8217;s not a very interesting device. I&#8217;m not gonna spend whatever Apple asks for iWork, because that&#8217;s stupid. I&#8217;m not gonna work on spread sheets, or keynotes without a keyboard. Sorry I don&#8217;t see that working out well. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I doubt it. As 1. an iDevice conference organizer it makes sense I know what my customers are playing with, and 2. as a hacker wannabe, I can&#8217;t wait to see what it&#8217;s truly capable of.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth waiting an extra month, paying more money (AND then paying $30/month for actual 3G) just to have an always (except that AT&amp;T fails so often it&#8217;s more like 80% of the time) connected device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iApp Review &#8211; Procamera</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got an email a few weeks ago, asking me to take a look at ProCamera. Sure why not, I&#8217;d love something that was better than the built in app, and GorillaCam came just shy of the mark for me. ProCamera (iTunes Link) might be it. Procamera has an impressive list of features. Steady Cam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an email a few weeks ago, asking me to take a look at ProCamera. Sure why not, I&#8217;d love something that was better than the built in app, and GorillaCam came just shy of the mark for me. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/procamera/id300216827?mt=8" target="_blank">ProCamera</a> (iTunes Link) might be it.</p>
<p>Procamera has an impressive list of features.</p>
<ul>
<li>Steady Cam</li>
<li>timer</li>
<li>autosave</li>
<li>full rez zoom</li>
<li>virtual horizon</li>
<li>pro grid</li>
<li>compass</li>
<li>Digital zoom</li>
</ul>
<p>Here&#8217;s a zoomed in pic and a regular to compare.</p>
<div id="attachment_1079" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_5001.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1079" title="Zoomed in" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_5001-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zoomed in</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1081" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4041.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1081" title="Regular" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4041-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Regular</p></div>
<p>I was really impressed with the zoom, it&#8217;s digital of course, but NOT complete crap.</p>
<p>One of my favorite features, and what really lost it for Gorillcam, background saving.</p>
<p>Once you a take a picture, the UI bar turns red, you can take more pictures, and use the app like normal, but until it&#8217;s green it&#8217;s saving in the back ground.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4042.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1082" title="IMG_4042" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4042-200x300.png" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a> As long as you have auto save turned on, just keep taking pictures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve actually moved pro Camera to page 1 of my homescreen, and the built in cam app is on the last page where Apple&#8217;s unremovable apps live.</p>
<p>Pros: Saving in the background. That&#8217;s huge.  The horizon is nice too. I always try to offset me horizons when I take pictures</p>
<p>Cons: None that come to mind, it&#8217;s a great app. i love the feature set, and the functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My take on the iPad &#8211; Might as well join in</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite what my more fervent fanboi friends think, I don't hate the iPad.

As the organizer of a conference for iPhone developers, I can't wait to see what they do with the iPad. I can't wait for panels on the differences, etc.

This post isn't about that. This post is about me as a techy, power user consumer. The exact person the iPad isn't for.

Alex Payne captures my thoughts on this really well. From a Flex Developer standpoint (Yeah that's right hater, Flash!) I think Doug sums it up well.

I'm not gonna lie I let the rumor mill wind my expectations up more than I should have.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite what my more fervent fanboi friends think, I don&#8217;t hate the iPad.</p>
<p>As the organizer of a conference for iPhone developers, I can&#8217;t wait to see what they do with the iPad. I can&#8217;t wait for panels on the differences, etc.</p>
<p>This post isn&#8217;t about that. This post is about me as a techy, power user consumer. The exact person the iPad isn&#8217;t for.</p>
<p><a href="http://al3x.net/2010/01/28/ipad.html" target="_blank">Alex Payne</a> captures my thoughts on this really well. From a Flex Developer standpoint (Yeah that&#8217;s right hater, Flash!) I think <a href="http://dougmccune.com/blog/2010/01/28/the-new-york-times-without-flash/" target="_blank">Doug</a> sums it up well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not gonna lie I let the rumor mill wind my expectations up more than I should have.</p>
<p><strong>I was expecting</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>iPhone OS &#8211; Got it</li>
<li>Cellular plan of some sort &#8211; Got it</li>
<li>affordable &#8211; sorta got it. based on features it&#8217;s murky but it&#8217;s not $2000, so that&#8217;s something.</li>
<li>Ability to run more than one iApp at it&#8217;s native size in a window &#8211; Nope didn&#8217;t get that</li>
<li>A USB Port or two &#8211; Nope</li>
<li>Some type of awesome MobileMe integration that would allow me to download files on my iSlate straight to mobileme where I could consume them on my real computer. &#8211; Nope, not even close, and MobileMe still sucks, not even an upgrade to it.</li>
<li>Flash &#8211; nope. Though I wasn&#8217;t surprised. Apple controls the playground, and in true bully fashion has no reason to stop.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s it. The camera everyone wants might be fun, but i don&#8217;t use the one on my Macbook, so&#8230;</p>
<p>I can survive without the USB ports, since clearly apple doesn&#8217;t like us to have access to the guts, that&#8217;s livable.</p>
<p>No multitasking is a deal breaker. Let&#8217;s be clear, I have an iPhone, I have a Macbook. If I want the &#8220;Real web&#8221; I can look at it on my macbook which is nice and light. If I want the Apple version of the web, I can use my iPhone.</p>
<p>Assuming I got the device I wanted, I never in a million years Imagined I&#8217;d leave my Macbook at home. Clearly I wouldn&#8217;t leave my iPhone at home either. I&#8217;d cary the tablet for when I walk around, or just need to do some lightweight work. I&#8217;d carry with me at conferences for note taking and controlling the mac mini&#8217;s on site if they need it. etc. it&#8217;d be a utility device. I could stream music, and work on my keynote for Wednesday, I could fire up IM and not be away from it, ditto for twitter. I&#8217;d basically be free to roam and not be tied to my laptop at the registration desk.</p>
<p>When I was going out and didn&#8217;t need my laptop, i figured my iSlate would be with me. Heck I could toss it in Nicole&#8217;s purse, or just hold it.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s not (yet) the device I want</strong>.</p>
<p>I admit, my hopes were pie in the sky. From the vitriol flowing out of twitter the last few days, I&#8217;m not alone. It&#8217;s almost like the Jets vs. sharks scene in West Side Story. The die hard fanbois are rushing to the defense of Apple and the iPad and those dissappointed and even angry are rushing to call it names, and shout how Apple has failed them. I say them because while I&#8217;m sad it&#8217;s not the device I want, I have no doubt it will sell like mad and people will love it. Fanbois will love it because it&#8217;s in their contract. Normal consumers will love it because it&#8217;s simple, doesn&#8217;t do anything but surf the web and send email, etc. My mom truly is the perfect candidate for this device.</p>
<p>I agree with Alex that it seems that Apple is turning down a path, where hackers and power users aren&#8217;t welcome, and aren&#8217;t their core business. They&#8217;re truly turning consumer. This is good, great, but also bad.</p>
<p>Good because I want Apple to succeed, I truly love their products and industrial design (though I hope they ditch shiny backs on ipods. Clearly Steve jobs has had his finger prints burnt off to not see the smudges the rest of us see, or he has a Eunuch to operate his iPod and iPhone for him). Bad because as Alex says, they&#8217;re turning their attention away from what (I think) they&#8217;re all about. Apple was founded by hackers, Apple survived a long time on hackers, and tinkerers and power users.</p>
<p>Lately all their devices are less and less hacker, tinkerer, power user friendly. I&#8217;m sure plenty of self proclaimed power users will say otherwise, running Photoshop all day, with other apps open, does not a power user make in my mind. Open Terminal, hack your shit! Change settings via bash, etc. That to me is a power user.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not possible on the iPad.</p>
<p><strong>Hope in the Jailbreakers</strong></p>
<p>I think the iPad has huge, huge potential. I think those folks that are angry have forgotten one key thing, the first version of most Apple gear is just meh. the first iPod, not so hot, awesome by the standards of the day of course, but compared to what iPods can do now. no.</p>
<p>The iPhone 2g when it was released had no apps but those Apple provided. Had no MMS, had no (long list of things, some still on it)</p>
<p>the OS wasn&#8217;t that great, the features weren&#8217;t that great, etc. the iPhone 3GS is quite a different machine. More powerful, more feature rich. I bought my 2G iPhone when the 3G was released, on Ebay. i didn&#8217;t fully jump on the bandwagon of iPhone until the 3GS. That was when it was a device I could use and like, outside of my fanboiism.</p>
<p>The Macbook Air had issues with it&#8217;s CPU cores, etc. Macbook pros mooo&#8217;d. There&#8217;s plenty of history of first gen issues. nothing major and Apple fixes them, but it&#8217;s common that the first run is to get the bugs out. Apple will make the iPad better. Perfect? no, but I hope it is eventually something I&#8217;ll want as a consumer.</p>
<p>P.S. Fanbois, please refrain from commenting on why I&#8217;m dumb for expecting something other than what I got. I&#8217;m sure you got exactly what you expected, you&#8217;re buying 4 of them the moment the site allows it, and you and Steve are on the same wavelength and this device is 100% the most awesome revolution in computing. I&#8217;ve heard it all before and it doesn&#8217;t add to the discussion. You have a blog, use it.</p>
<p>I would like to know what everyone thinks about the iPad in the least fanboish ways possible, what will you use it for, what do you think it&#8217;s strength is, other than, of course being Magical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
