<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>johnwilker.com &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/category/iPhone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com</link>
	<description>John Wilker: Community, Code, Randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Kindle Fire is a great second tablet</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/12/the-kindle-fire-is-a-great-second-tablet/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/12/the-kindle-fire-is-a-great-second-tablet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Jeffry sent me a Kindle Fire last week. He&#8217;s awesome! You should check out his Flex components if you&#8217;re a flex/AIR developer looking for some awesome turn key components. Ok that said, he sent me a kindle Fire. I&#8217;ve been a Kindle owner since the K2 came out, and I paid almost $400 [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Jeffry sent me a Kindle Fire last week. He&#8217;s awesome! You should check out his <a href="http://flextras.com">Flex components</a> if you&#8217;re a flex/AIR developer looking for some awesome turn key components. Ok that said, he sent me a kindle Fire.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Fire-Amazon-Tablet/dp/B0051VVOB2/ref=amb_link_359054302_2?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-1&amp;pf_rd_r=0Q4XN4AYPKD52TP121XZ&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=1337101402&amp;pf_rd_i=507846"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1337" title="Screen Shot 2011-12-08 at 3.39.42 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Screen-Shot-2011-12-08-at-3.39.42-PM-300x220.png" alt="" width="300" height="220" /></a>I&#8217;ve been a Kindle owner since the K2 came out, and I paid almost $400 for it. I dropped it one morning and busted the screen, and bought a K3 for 1/3 the price of my K2, and I love it. It&#8217;s light, easy to use and great at the one thing it does, display words on a readable screen.</p>
<p>Enter the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Fire-Amazon-Tablet/dp/B0051VVOB2/ref=amb_link_359054302_2?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-1&amp;pf_rd_r=0Q4XN4AYPKD52TP121XZ&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=1337101402&amp;pf_rd_i=507846">Kindle Fire</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using the Fire since I got it, and like it, mostly. We&#8217;ve drafted it into service at <a href="http://uncubedspace.com">Uncubed</a> as a digital lending library, loading up PragProg books and the Magazine on it for any member that wants to check it out.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve been using it as well for various things.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Reading.</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m very much anti reading on backlit screens. I&#8217;ve tried it on the iPad and end up staring at my eyeballs and falling asleep. Same with my Xoom, even when both had screen covers to make them less mirror-like. I tried on my iPhone, nope, same issue.</p>
<p>The screen on the Fire is definitely shiny but the default look of the Book reading app is a pinkish tinted background with black text (I dunno if it&#8217;s me, but the text seems to change color randomly in places, which helps focus my eyes). That color/contrast actually is quite readable. I&#8217;ve been using the Fire to read at night or at my desk. Both use cases work great.</p>
<p>The page turning is a bit sensitive, I&#8217;ve accidentally changed pages a few times, the lightest touch in the wrong place and it&#8217;s a new page. That&#8217;s something you get used to though.</p>
<p>Where it doesn&#8217;t work is the gym. The Fire is heavy. I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s lead shot in there somewhere or what, but it weighs A LOT. so the gym is out, I don&#8217;t want my reader to be my resistance training.</p>
<p><strong>Amazon Experience.</strong></p>
<p>From the moment the rumors started to fly about a Kindle Tablet, I said they were the only ones who had a snowballs chance to compete (maybe not beat, maybe, who knows) with Apple. They have the closed system with lots of lock in. My books were immediate available on the fire, I just had to re-download them. If you have an Amazon Prime account (you really should get one) then you can stream all kinds of video content, You can borrow books, you can upload music. The Amazon eco system is really a strong player. I immediately had music, books and video content at my finger tips and it was easy to access.</p>
<p>The other thing I think Amazon has going for it is, they can take the opposite approach Motorola and HP took to compete with the iPad. You can&#8217;t be the same price or worse yet more money, than the iPad. But if you&#8217;re half the price, and can offer an awesome foundation of apps, video, music and more, then there&#8217;s very few</p>
<p><strong>Apps.</strong></p>
<p>The app store is, meh. Everything I&#8217;ve bought from the Amazon App store that was compatible with the Fire was there and ready to be re-downloaded, which is nice. A lot still isn&#8217;t Fire friendly, but can be side loaded which works ok. But in general the app store is as much a mess as the Google one, with shit quality apps mixed in with really great ones. That&#8217;s likely to fix itself tho. My favorite news reader isn&#8217;t on the Fire but I found one that is ok. It&#8217;s good enough considering reading RSS feeds on the Fire is likely to be a not very often thing.</p>
<p><strong>Video.</strong></p>
<p>Vide on the Fire seems ok to me. I tried out hulu and Netflix, both were great. Dear Hulu, the Fire can run your app by my Xoom can&#8217;t? that&#8217;s craptastic, just sayin&#8217;. I also tried out the Amazon Prime streaming video and that was fine, it wasn&#8217;t HD and that was clear, but much of (that I&#8217;ve seen) the Prime video library right now is older TV shows and movies.  Overall It&#8217;s a great little movie watcher. The lame amount of internal storage precludes you from loading your own movies on it. You can, but only 1-2 movies are likely to fit. But if you&#8217;re in the net, stream away and enjoy.</p>
<p><strong>OS.</strong></p>
<p>To the casual user, I doubt they&#8217;d ever know it was Android, it&#8217;s so heavily skinned and modified. To someone like me that&#8217;s annoying. I want to tweak settings, etc. and Amazon has taken a very Apple-like stance in that you can change the most basic of settings, and that&#8217;s it. The rest is locked down.</p>
<p>The carrousel thing SUCKS. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;ll be gone in the next major OS revision. it&#8217;s retarded. It&#8217;s a running history of everything you do on the Fire, apps, movies, books, etc in one big ass list. And it takes up most of the screen in portrait and all of it in Landscape. It&#8217;s terrible. Amazon find a better UX for the home screen.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s things Apple just gets, that others need to shamelessly copy. Changing screen orientation is one of them. Rotating your iPhone you see a nice animation of the screen kind reshaping and fitting into the new size. Rotating the Fire and you see the old orientation, a blink of nothing, and the new orientation. like the damn Matrix redrawing when something is changed. It&#8217;s really terrible. Not OMG I can&#8217;t use the device, but OMG how did no one flip out about this before launch?</p>
<p><strong>Magazines and Comics.</strong></p>
<p>I was really excited about comics. I&#8217;ve tried every reader made for the iPad and Xoom, they all blow. Amazon secured some awesome exclusives so I assumed the comic reading experience despite smaller screen would be great. I was wrong. I&#8217;m glad I sampled the comics first before buying. It&#8217;s close, I&#8217;ll grant you, but having to double tap the panel you want to zoom into, and then again double tapping to get back to regular page view is terrible. Why not once zoomed in, allow me to swipe panel to panel, in the proper order? Reading comics was the pits.</p>
<p>The magazine experience wasn&#8217;t much better. Mostly because of the screen size. Zinio is a great app, I can see why it isn&#8217;t on the Fire, but that&#8217;s a loss for users. It might blow on a tiny screen too, who knows, but the amazon magazine viewer is useless. Bummed I didn&#8217;t sample the magazine I bought.</p>
<p><strong>Hardware.</strong></p>
<p>I already mentioned that the Fire is heavy, like small dog heavy. Really the hardware is probably my largest complaint, even beyond the stupid carousel UI. Where to start?</p>
<p>The power button. Clearly someone who&#8217;s never seen a kindle and never unplugged a device one handed did the design work on the Fire. Every Kindle since the beginning of time has had a slider for sleep/wake. the K3 it lights up all pretty etc. The Fire has a button, like most other tablets, but it&#8217;s right next to the USB connector. I can&#8217;t be the only person who unplugs devices with one hand, grasping the cable and pushing against the device on both sides of the plug. Doing that withe the Fire presses the power button. LAME.</p>
<p>Speakers, not including speakers might have been better. The Xoom has them on the back of the device, which blows. The Fire has them on the side, on the same side! Watching a video or listening to music, it&#8217;s very clear the sound is coming at you from only one direction. It&#8217;s a little off-putting.</p>
<p>Did i mention that is&#8217;a heavy device?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>So, second tablet?</strong> For me a Tablet is a news reader, email browser, and web client&#8230; mostly, sure I game little, and other stuff. I&#8217;ll remote into a laptop once in a while, manage my torrents, write notes in Evernote, etc, but for the most part it&#8217;s browsing and reading content. The Fire is just not right for that. Too small screen makes reading more than books, a pain. I love the size, it fits in my back pocket and the pockets of my coats, which earns it some serious points. Of course it&#8217;s weight pulls my pants down, so&#8230;</p>
<p>I think the next version of the Kindle Fire, both Hardware and OS will kick ass. This one is very much a &#8220;let&#8217;s get it out and see what people love and hate, and make the Fire2 (forest fire? Blaze?) the best Kindle Tablet possible&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/12/the-kindle-fire-is-a-great-second-tablet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So an Amazon Tablet huh</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/09/so-an-amazon-tablet-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/09/so-an-amazon-tablet-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought I&#8217;d take a minute to weigh in on the whole Amazon Kindle tablet thing now the buzz and punditry has kinda died down. I&#8217;m interested, but still skeptical. I DO however LOVE my kindle 3 lest someone immediately jump to &#8220;Hater&#8221; The touch model is uninteresting, I don&#8217;t see value in an e-ink touch [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I&#8217;d take a minute to weigh in on the whole Amazon Kindle tablet thing now the buzz and punditry has kinda died down.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested, but still skeptical. I DO however LOVE my kindle 3 lest someone immediately jump to &#8220;Hater&#8221;</p>
<p>The touch model is uninteresting, I don&#8217;t see value in an e-ink touch screen. Even with improved refresh rate and such, I just don&#8217;t see a long term usability there. Add on the whole, &#8220;touch in the middle for menu, touch on the sides to change pages&#8221; thing, i just don&#8217;t see the use. in the long run. Typing might not suck completely but I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s not awesome.</p>
<p>The one with the D-pad but no keyboard. Ok but i think it&#8217;ll be only slightly useful. If nothing else entering wifi credentials is gonna suck, and I assume it still has note making capability, which will get old fast hunting and pecking across an on-screen keyboard. I do like the look of it, very clean. While I love my keyboard when I need it, it&#8217;s a definite space waste 90% of the time I&#8217;m using my Kindle. That 10% however is huge. I don&#8217;t surf the web or tweet (who are these people that bitch about the browser ON THEIR E-READER. YOu guys are doing it wrong) but I make lots of notes. Sometimes I share those notes out, most of the time I don&#8217;t. But I take lots of notes when I&#8217;m reading non-fiction. Since getting my K3 and seeing the shared highlights of others, it&#8217;s clear I&#8217;m not the only one. Tapping out a lengthy note to myself or observation on an on-screen keyboard that refreshes like e-ink&#8230; no thanks.</p>
<p>I hate typing my passwords on my AppleTV using the stupid remote, and dread when I need to do it on the PS3, all for the same reason. hunting and pecking via a direction pad is a terrible way to use a keyboard. So yeah the keyboard less one and the touch one likely will be huge to readers of fiction or those who see no value in adding any type of annotation. That&#8217;s not a criticism just an observation of usage.</p>
<p>Now the Nook color&#8230; oops the Kindle Fire I mean.</p>
<p><strong>I don&#8217;t read on backlit things</strong>. I read way too much, and just can&#8217;t do it. I might read a page on my Xoom (kindle app) from time to time, but when it&#8217;s sit down and enjoy a book time, it&#8217;s not on a reflective backlit screen.</p>
<p><strong>I love the size. </strong>The only thing RIM did right in the playbook in my opinion was the size. The OS was nice and had they executed in a way that in any way resembled a real world view of the market I have little doubt the playbook coulda been a real player. But that&#8217;s a different post. The size was great. It fit in my shorts pocket. My coat pocket, and the small outside pocket of my laptop bag(s). No I probably wouldn&#8217;t use it as an every day tablet for catching up on news feeds, or things like that. but for quickly reviewing email or twitter, for a quick (who am I kidding right) game of Angry Birds and such it&#8217;s perfect. The playbook had an incredible screen, I hope the Fire does too.</p>
<p><strong>Watching things.</strong> My other big use case for any tablet is watching stuff. I&#8217;ll be leaving for Adobe MAX tomorrow and my Xoom is loaded with a movie or two and some episodes of TV I haven&#8217;t watched yet. Prior to the iPad and Xoom I watched stuff on my iPhone. The larger tablets are great, but my eyesight is fine, so a smaller screen is also cool. And the Playbook size screen i found to be just right. Not so heavy I get bored/tired of holding it up, and not so small I&#8217;m squinting to see the show. So I think the size of the Fire is a good choice and keeps it on my &#8220;I&#8217;m watching you&#8221; list. Had it been 10&#8243; I probably wouldn&#8217;t care since I have the xoom. It does just fine.</p>
<p><strong>Content is king. </strong>This applies over and over and you see things fail for this simple reason (cough RIM, HP, most android devices). Amazon unlike HP and android and RIM has content. It&#8217;s got amazon prime and cloud drive music. Remember why we all love our iDevices? The content and the ease of managing that content, and the ease of using that content. Amazon has a shot here. I thought HP did too, but frankly HP is clearly run by people who don&#8217;t get that it&#8217;s 2011 not 1992.</p>
<p>As Amazon adds more content to Prime, it gets more and more interesting to me. Since Netflix as a company is beginning to annoy me, I might just redirect my $ and attention to Amazon if they can get a bit more content. I know they compete but it&#8217;d be awesome if Amazon Prime VOD was added to AppleTV, that&#8217;d be a Netflix killer for me at least.</p>
<p>What wasn&#8217;t talked about and what I&#8217;ve said over and over in regards to Android vs. Apple user experience is the content management. Android is catching up a little with Google Music, etc but has a LONG way to go, and if your media isn&#8217;t in their cloud, it&#8217;s a PITA to get it on your Android device. Lock in&#8230; gotta love it. But if Amazon makes managing my on device content easy and seamless (even if it means a simple upload from iTunes to Amazon to download to device) way to manage the stuff on my tablet, well they may be the alternative to Apple that Android promised to be. Of course the Kindle aspect of the device much like the Nook aspect of the Nook Color, not at all interesting, but the device itself&#8230; hmm</p>
<p>Of course nothing at all was shown in relation to that type of thing which doesn&#8217;t fill me with warm fuzzies, BUT the Fire doesn&#8217;t even ship for 2 more months so&#8230;</p>
<p>So my haven&#8217;t-even-seen-or-touched-it-yet opinion. I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic. I didn&#8217;t pre-order anything and I&#8217;ll wait for some hands on reviews before I make an moves.</p>
<p>Did you pre-order? What&#8217;d you get?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/09/so-an-amazon-tablet-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can i get streaming media? Pretty please?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/06/can-i-get-streaming-media-pretty-please/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/06/can-i-get-streaming-media-pretty-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out, with the Motorola Xoom, the answer is no. Hulu. No. Lots of devices including the Nexus one. Really? the Nexus One has the hardware but the xoom doesn&#8217;t? Ok not lots. Far from lots. Hundreds of handsets and tablets on the market now, and 6 can run hulu. I retract &#8220;lots&#8221; I like [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out, with the Motorola Xoom, the answer is no.</p>
<p><strong>Hulu. No.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Screen-Shot-2011-06-27-at-2.12.04-PM.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1299" title="Screen Shot 2011-06-27 at 2.12.04 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Screen-Shot-2011-06-27-at-2.12.04-PM.png" alt="" width="138" height="146" /></a>Lots of devices including the Nexus one. Really? the Nexus One has the hardware but the xoom doesn&#8217;t?</p>
<p>Ok not lots. Far from lots. Hundreds of handsets and tablets on the market now, and 6 can run hulu. I retract &#8220;lots&#8221;</p>
<p>I like my Xoom  a lot, i&#8217;ve invested good sizes bits of my $ to buying apps to make the device my go to tablet. I like the size, I like the form factor, I like the OS. But traveling with the Xoom (as I did to WWDC this year) is kind of the pits, unless I make sure to pre-load the device with downloaded content.</p>
<p><strong>Netflix. No.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Screen-Shot-2011-06-27-at-2.12.39-PM.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1300" title="Screen Shot 2011-06-27 at 2.12.39 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Screen-Shot-2011-06-27-at-2.12.39-PM.png" alt="" width="386" height="227" /></a></p>
<p>My understanding is that it&#8217;s largely to do with the encryption/DRM capabilities of the device. OK that makes sense.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What doesn&#8217;t make sense to me, as a prosumer techy with a $600 device on my desk&#8230; How did Motorola not build the Xoom with these two apps in mind?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Better yet, how was Moto (for that matter, Google too) NOT working with both companies from the get go, to ensure that the Flagship tablet of the Android Army, the first device to ship with Honeycomb, wasn&#8217;t at the top of the compatible devices list?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It was one thing when neither service had an app for android, it made using the Xoom, not a &#8220;This or that&#8221; decision with my iPad. But now, now two of the main use cases for my iPad (other than games and Omnifocus) are available for android&#8230; just not my android.</p>
<p>Gruber sums it up pretty well in &#8220;<a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/06/24/fragmentation">Fragmentation, I don&#8217;t see any fragmentation</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, there&#8217;s plenty I don&#8217;t  like about the way apple does things, but for the most part they don&#8217;t seem as determined as Google and Motorola do, to drive me away from their platform. :(</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/06/can-i-get-streaming-media-pretty-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry playbook, so close, so very very far</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/blackberry-playbook-so-close-so-very-very-far/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/blackberry-playbook-so-close-so-very-very-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Hulu, no netflix, no Kindle, no Email/calendar, no twitter client&#8230; just to name a few glaring shortcomings. Awesome screen, great size, interesting and capable OS just to name a few of it&#8217;s strongest points. I got my playbook (finally) about 2 weeks ago, and was holding off on my review to give it a [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1290" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000010.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1290" title="Movie playing while in app switch" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000010-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for Larger</p></div>
<p>No Hulu, no netflix, no Kindle, no Email/calendar, no twitter client&#8230; just to name a few glaring shortcomings.</p>
<p>Awesome screen, great size, interesting and capable OS just to name a few of it&#8217;s strongest points.</p>
<p>I got my playbook (finally) about 2 weeks ago, and was holding off on my review to give it a little while to stabilize. It hasn&#8217;t yet, so this review may see a part two but I thought I&#8217;d get my thoughts down on on the playbook at the time of it&#8217;s launch.</p>
<p>In short, it&#8217;s not there. If you own a crack berry phone, it might be just what you need/want, since you&#8217;d have the missing apps on your phone, and email/PIM stuff via the bridge.</p>
<p><strong>I love the size</strong>, I know Apple thinks a small tablet is stupid (though they seem to think shrinking laptops is ok) but I love the idea of something I can throw in my bag or my shorts pocket and be productive. Since getting useful tablets, my iPhone is basically a twitter/checkin device, and I suppose a phone. Everything else is done on the tablets. So a nice usable small device to supplement my main laptop or even another tablet is nice.</p>
<div id="attachment_1284" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000007.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1284" title="The movie scales down (the file is a 1080p file)" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000007-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for larger</p></div>
<p>The screen is truly awesome. I&#8217;m very impressed with it, when watching video. I don&#8217;t need a dedicated video device, when I have a Xoom, an iPad and an iPhone, but if I did, the Playbook would be it.</p>
<p>The OS is interesting, for sure, the interactive bezel is great, though it takes some getting used to, and to remember what swiping this way and that do. BUT it&#8217;s nice that those bezels are more than just space wasters. Kudos to RIM.</p>
<p>The gestures are great for getting around. It doesn&#8217;t capture well in a screen shot, but things are active when switching, Up kept playing until I picked a new app, Need For Speed was rotating my car until I selected a different app. It&#8217;s nice that things don&#8217;t immediately stop.</p>
<p><strong>The AppWorld.</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_1283" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000004.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1283" title="App World" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000004-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for larger</p></div>
<p>What a nightmare. I&#8217;m honestly surprised by the app world. I know RIM was giving away devices to anyone who submitted an app, yet there&#8217;s no twitter app? really? No one built a twitter app? Apparently someone built an Email app (the same devs who built the VNC app I bought) but it&#8217;s still in review (sounds like there&#8217;s some suspicion it&#8217;s intentional)</p>
<p>The thing that makes the Playbook useless, is it&#8217;s lack of apps. It&#8217;s a serious bummer, given how hard RIM was pushing to get developers on board. I honestly can&#8217;t imagine someone didn&#8217;t build the missing apps. Either all the devs assumed someone else was building the twitter app and the gouge reader interface app, or RIM for some reason is not approving those apps. I don&#8217;t know which, but it doesn&#8217;t really matter. The apps that are most important are missing from the Playbook.</p>
<p>Stuff like hulu, and netflix I can understand, tho I hope they at least tried to get a deal with netflix and failed vs. didn&#8217;t even try.</p>
<p>Stuff that right now requires the bridge I can understand (tho it&#8217;s a collossal fuck up) and my understanding is it will be fixed come a &#8216;future update&#8217;. But things like twitter, google reader (there is one, but it doesn&#8217;t work), alternate browsers, google docs! and more are missing and basically leave the playbook dead in the water.</p>
<p>I have hopes (not high ones) that RIM will be very quick with OS updates (by the time my device arrived, one was already out) that fill in some of these really glaring gaps in usability. I also hope that some of the developers who had apps approved, were holding them</p>
<div id="attachment_1285" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1285 " title="Connected to my Macbook" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000009-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for larger</p></div>
<p>back to test on a device, and the app world will see moderate flooding of good apps in the very near term.</p>
<p>I did pick up a VNC App (aVNC) which sorta works, but has a ways to go. But in a pinch I could make do with it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Desktop integration</strong></p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t any (for the mac). Ok that&#8217;s not 100% true but here&#8217;s my experience. I plugged my playbook in and it was detected (as an IP address oddly enough) in my finder. I could browse the file system, move files to and from, etc. On the PB screen it said, go get the desktop app. I did, it installed just fine, even found the previous data file from when I had my torch. It never saw the playbook. I told it to look for new devices, nothing. I cleared out the torch, nothing. I unplugged and re-plugged in the PB while the app was running, nada. I closed the app, then plugged in the device since it has a helper that runs, still nothing. I don&#8217;t know if the desktop mac app just hasn&#8217;t been updated or if it was my machine, but in either case, no joy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Verdict.</strong></p>
<p>I like the Playbook for what it can be. I like my Xoom and iPad for what they are. They have huge potential too, and I&#8217;m not worried they&#8217;ll live up to it. The Playbook is more of an uncertainty. I&#8217;ve decided that RIM has two months to get their house in order. They pushed one OS update out very fast, in two months, I expect at least 1 if not 2 more. I think that&#8217;s fair, you can&#8217;t compete today if you take 6 mos. to a year for every update. If in two months, there&#8217;s no native Email, twitter, news reader apps&#8230; well I&#8217;ll see what the Ebay market is like, probably not good, maybe it&#8217;ll be a gift to someone who doesn&#8217;t need better tech.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s almost summer and there&#8217;s always HP and WebOS to hope for.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000013.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1287" title="Need For Speed" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000013-300x175.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></a><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000006.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1289" title="Home screen" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/IMG_00000006-300x175.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/blackberry-playbook-so-close-so-very-very-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I hope to see at WWDC</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/what-i-hope-to-see-at-wwdc/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/what-i-hope-to-see-at-wwdc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blah blah, i know it&#8217;s that season (I think I said this last year too) but I was thinking about Devin&#8217;s post about possible retail store products for their 10th anniversary and figured I&#8217;d throw out my best guesses for the WWDC keynote. Not retail store product options, Devin covered those as well as I [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah blah, i know it&#8217;s that season (I think I said this last year too) but I was thinking about <a href="http://devin.reams.me/2011/list-of-potential-new-apple-products/">Devin&#8217;s post</a> about possible retail store products for their 10th anniversary and figured I&#8217;d throw out my best guesses for the WWDC keynote. Not retail store product options, Devin covered those as well as I could. But really honest to goodness possible products.</p>
<p>The rumor mills are going nuts over the iPhone 4s-5-superDuper, so who knows, and I&#8217;m not gonna bother speculating there.</p>
<p><strong>But what about Apps for AppleTV?</strong> We know it&#8217;s running some type of iOS, why not a subset of the full app catalog for media apps? Hulu? CBS? HBO GO, etc. How awesome to integrate an app store model into the AppleTV. Heck, with a magic trackpad paired, even iOS games could be viable.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Or maybe iPod Nano Touch 2nd Gen?</strong> I love my iWatch, and I&#8217;d love even more for it to do more, though I hope a camera is not one of those things. Cameras are like netflix apps, every device has 2 or 3.</p>
<p>Maybe take a queue from the <a href="http://www.metawatch.org/">metawatch</a> movement? If anyone could make it a clean user experience it&#8217;s Apple. Why not have my watch show me the SMS that just came in, or my most recent push notifications? I&#8217;d love to glance down and see where certain friends are without pulling my phone out of my pocket.</p>
<p>Maybe even an SDK for basic apps? watch faces? etc. That&#8217;d be awesome.</p>
<p>This is a bit out there, at least this year. But, <strong>SSD only laptops.</strong> No optical drive, either 2 drives used separately, boot to the SSD, store data on the HDD, or 2 SSD&#8217;s in a RAID array. I&#8217;m running the former configuration right now in my Macbook and love it. Booting into Lion&#8230;erp Rawrdacted sorry, is cake. Certain features in that OS really really benefit from having an SSD as boot drive, and with the Mac App Store, who needs DVD drives anymore? Even OS X is distributed through it, and new machines can have the OS recovery on a USB drive like the Macbook Air. So why not use that space for something else? Something better.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it, pretty simple, nothing too pie int he sky. Ok maybe the iWatch part, but I can hope, everything is in the realm of the possible, maybe not this year but next or the one after.</p>
<p>What do you think we&#8217;ll see at WWDC in a few weeks?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/05/what-i-hope-to-see-at-wwdc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Xoom review</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/04/my-xoom-review/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/04/my-xoom-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been meaning to write this for a few days, and decided I just need to sit down and do it. Be aware, this review has no pics. There&#8217;s so many pics of the Xoom and the iPad out there, there&#8217;s just no need for them now. We all know what a tablet looks like [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to write this for a few days, and decided I just need to sit down and do it. Be aware, this review has no pics. There&#8217;s so many pics of the Xoom and the iPad out there, there&#8217;s just no need for them now. We all know what a tablet looks like now.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>OK here&#8217;s my thoughts on the Xoom&#8230;</p>
<p><strong> The short:</strong> I like it, I like it a lot. I&#8217;ve been using it almost exclusively since my friend and colleague <a href="http://www.flextras.com">Jeffy Houser</a> gave it to me for my work on <a href="http://www.theflexshow.com">The Flex Show</a>. It&#8217;s no iPad but it&#8217;s nice.</p>
<p><strong>The </strong><strong>Long version:</strong></p>
<p><strong>OS: </strong>Honeycomb seems like a great OS. Google shoulda been working on it sooner, and needs to stop dicking around trying to port it to a phone. Rock tablets, and let Honeycomb&#8217;s successor be the 1 OS for both.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got some rough spots, but overall I&#8217;ve found it to be a great Tablet OS. I had a Viewsonic gTablet and tried 2.2 and 2.3 on it. Clearly neither OS was made for Tablets, so the experience sucked! But the Xoom, feels and works like a tablet should.</p>
<p>The widgets rock, the transitions between screens are very nice, and clean.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Apps (marketplace): </strong>Point, Apple. I admit, most of the apps on my iPhone and iPad, I can live without, some I never even open after installing or using once. However, right now, <a href="https://market.android.com/details?id=apps_tablet_featured">there are like 62 apps</a> made for honeycomb. Not 1 is a twitter app!!</p>
<p>Many of the apps for the Xoom, are stupid, so being available doesn&#8217;t really do much. Thankfully google does a better job at upscaling than Apple does, so phone apps, mostly don&#8217;t look like ass on the Xoom, assuming they work</p>
<p>Say what you will about Apple and the iOS Store, the Google marketplace is pretty much like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U7HztvetQk">Dave Chappelle predicted</a>. Amazon has cleaned up the mess a bit, but they&#8217;re not there yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been pretty happy with the Xoom app wise, not really missing most iOS apps. Here&#8217;s the ones I miss and why.</p>
<ul>
<li>OmniFocus &#8211; I&#8217;ve invested in their offering. It&#8217;s on my iPhone, iPad, and mac. Making todo lists, etc is nice when they&#8217;re shared across devices.</li>
<li>Flipboard &#8211; I&#8217;ve got <a href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.alphonso.pulse&amp;feature=search_result">Pulse</a>, and <a href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.chriswstewart.rss&amp;feature=search_result">Newsr</a> but Flipboard and Reeder were my goto apps and I do miss them. NetNewsWire too for that matter. My iPad was mainly remote desktop, and news reading.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s really it. There&#8217;s a few others I&#8217;d like to have on the Xoom for sure, but if any combo of those three apps made it to the Xoom I&#8217;d be cool.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Ecosystem: </strong>Win, Apple. Obviously lock in is a big part of this picture, and Apple certainly gains nothing by cooperating, but not having a viable iTunes replacement is a huge loss for the Xoom, and android in general. There&#8217;s DoubleTwist which is ok, but nothing remotely close to the awesome experience Apple offers. I will give Double Twist props for the over the Air syncing. Apple, really you shoulda figured this out already.</p>
<p>But yeah I STILL haven&#8217;t gotten any of my pics onto the Xoom. There&#8217;s not USB host support yet (fail) and Double Twist does music and sorta, video only. Even the Dropbox app doesn&#8217;t support saving an image from dropbox to the local storage. I could do some wifi FTP stuff, but that&#8217;s just too much work as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p><strong>Other Tablets: A</strong>pple needs competition, so does Motorola. But more importantly, if Google hopes to make some headway against Apple, with Tablets, they need to have more devices out there. Motorola did a good job with the Xoom, but I think someone can do better.</p>
<p>Plus if they (Motorola and Google, etc) hope to get developers interested in building apps for Tablets, there needs to be more devices out there to run them. I suspect part of the reason there&#8217;s only 63 apps is that many developers don&#8217;t want to waste their time, if there&#8217;s a chance the OS could change or google could scrap it entirely (GoogleTV anyone?)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So verdict? If you&#8217;re ok not having many apps right now (the main ones are there. Evernote, a nice VNC app, tweetdeck sorta works, Firefox, dropbox, etc), and can survive without iTunes-like desktop love. The Xoom might be a fun device for you. The OS is certainly more computer-y which I like, but it&#8217;s definitely an easy device to use. Easy as an iPad, no. Easy enough for a non moron? Yes.</p>
<p>Like I said, i&#8217;ve been leaving my iPad at home the last two weeks, and am surviving quite well. I haven&#8217;t gifted my ipad to Nicole yet, so I have the option to go back, but honestly, with an iPhone, not sure I will.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/04/my-xoom-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Google and Motorola, you&#8217;re doing it wrong</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/dear-google-and-motorola-youre-doing-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/dear-google-and-motorola-youre-doing-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Justin tweeted this and it really called out something I had noticed the first time I saw the Moto Xoom commercial. Motorola (and by extension Google) are doing advertising WRONG. Below are the commercials for the Xoom, and the iPad. Notice anything? Motorola spends their time with spaceships, and flashy weirdness, some dude [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Justin <a href="http://twitter.com/justinw/status/47504431914299392">tweeted this</a> and it really called out something I had noticed the first time I saw the Moto Xoom commercial. Motorola (and by extension Google) are doing advertising WRONG.</p>
<p>Below are the commercials for the Xoom, and the iPad. Notice anything? Motorola spends their time with spaceships, and flashy weirdness, some dude looking around the cockpit of a space pod, talking about technology specs (as a geek this appeals to me, but I&#8217;m the minority. I don&#8217;t need an ad to decide to buy something) and showing perhaps, 10 seconds of actual device screen, and most of that is a game. I get that the commercial is aimed at showing the game playability of the Xoom. Great, that commercial should be 3-4 down the line. Establish the device as usable first, then highlight game play (if you have to)</p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/e/TxZ6NQnIPkU"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/e/TxZ6NQnIPkU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="306" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Now look at the iPad commercial.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/e/fNNIfNXCjRc"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/e/fNNIfNXCjRc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="306" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Notice anything? It spends the entire time with nothing but the device. The hands belong to someone, but we don&#8217;t need to see him, nor do we need to see him approach the chair, look bewildered about the iPad just sitting on the chair unattended and then sit down, look around some more, be amazed at the quality of the chair&#8217;s leather, appreciate the stitching, etc, etc. We see hands using the iPad to do a number of things. Not one thing, many. Sure IMO they&#8217;re mostly stupid things I almost never do on my iPad, but the point is, they show how to use the iPad.</p>
<p>Motorola, fire your ad firm. Hire someone who&#8217;s at least used an iPad, and hopefully someone who&#8217;s used a Xoom. I know there isn&#8217;t a lot of apps made just for the xoom, that&#8217;s fine, the iPad commercial focuses on all built in apps. Sure later ones have focused on third party apps, but launch commercials are just the apps Apple shipped it with. Surely there&#8217;re enough built in honeycomb apps to make a 30 second commercial. Heck look at Apple. Photo viewer, video player, maps, calendar, etc. Nothing crazy, nothing flashy or &#8220;OMG THAT APP IS ON A TABLET!!!!&#8221; just everyday use apps.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I almost wonder if Motorola hired the same firm HP did with the pre commercials? I&#8217;m sure some ad wonk Don Draper wannabe will explain the ad is less about the device and more about the futuristic feel of it, or some ad wonk bullshit. That&#8217;s not what sells things in 2011. Maybe it did in the 70s and 80s when consumers (no offense mom and dad) were a bit more stupid and easily confused, but that&#8217;s not how it works now. LEARN OR DIE.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/dear-google-and-motorola-youre-doing-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wrist, Valuable Realestate</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/the-wrist-valuable-realestate/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/the-wrist-valuable-realestate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Creator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading this article the other day, and it pretty much jived with my review(one and two) of the &#8216;iWatch&#8217; There&#8217;s plenty of &#8220;I just use my iPhone, why would i want a watch?&#8221; people, and that&#8217;s fine, as with all things, it takes all kinds. I have a nice large watch box, full [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/158246/2011/03/gartenberg_nano.html" target="_blank">this article</a> the other day, and it pretty much jived with my review(<a href="http://johnwilker.com/2010/10/my-review-the-iwatch/" target="_blank">one</a> and <a href="http://johnwilker.com/2011/02/iwatch-review-part-two-the-lunatik/" target="_blank">two</a>) of the &#8216;iWatch&#8217;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty of &#8220;I just use my iPhone, why would i want a watch?&#8221; people, and that&#8217;s fine, as with all things, it takes all kinds. I have a nice large watch box, full of nice analog and digital watches, and now my iWatch. I&#8217;ll probably wear watches forever, or I should say, something on my wrist.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve joked with friends, but from the moment i got my first iPod Touch, I&#8217;ve been on the look out for something that would make it wearable on a wrist. iOS doesn&#8217;t really lend itself (sadly!) to landscape orientation, but android (mostly) does. I wouldn&#8217;t care that I&#8217;d invite being beaten up.</p>
<p>I hate talking on my phone, I dread it. I&#8217;ve thought, and still do about ditching my iPhone, getting an iPod Touch, and just having a blackberry or android phone. I really want a multi purpose computer, that&#8217;s easily accessible, always on me, etc.</p>
<p>A watch, or watch like device is the perfect thing. Easy to type on (though obviously not a replacement for a phone if you&#8217;re a lotsa email, texting type of person, but for firing off a quick &#8220;Im here&#8221; sms, etc.</p>
<p>I think the first step will be a connected watch type thing. As mentioned in the article, a watch that lets you accept/decline phone calls, shows your calendar, etc. Either from a connected device from Bluetooth, or with it&#8217;s own connection to the internet.</p>
<p>But I do think eventually we&#8217;ll have a device, the size of an iPhone or so, that fits comfortably on a wrist, has a camera for facetiming/skyping, etc. I&#8217;ll be glad when that time comes. I&#8217;d love to not worry about where I sat my phone down? Did I leave it at the bar, or at home? etc.</p>
<p>A device like this, if it&#8217;s where my watch would be, becomes less a gadget and more a part of my life, something I grab when I&#8217;m getting dressed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/03/the-wrist-valuable-realestate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mobile playground is shrinking, buh bye Nokia</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2011/02/the-mobile-playground-is-shrinking-buh-bye-nokia/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2011/02/the-mobile-playground-is-shrinking-buh-bye-nokia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#8217;s been an interesting few days for those who obsess over mobile stuff, myself included. First HP announced their new WebOS line up. In a word, &#8220;sexy&#8221;. In another, &#8220;too late to market&#8221; Ok that&#8217;s four words, but still. The current time frame for us to play with a TouchPad or Pre 3. &#8220;Summer&#8221; not [...]<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s been an interesting few days for those who obsess over mobile stuff, myself included.</p>
<p>First HP announced their new WebOS line up. In a word, &#8220;sexy&#8221;. In another, &#8220;too late to market&#8221; Ok that&#8217;s four words, but still.</p>
<p>The current time frame for us to play with a <a href="http://www.palm.com/us/products/pads/touchpad/index.html?jumpid=ex_SEM/Google/HP%20TouchPad%20-%20Brand/PaidSearch" target="_blank">TouchPad</a> or Pre 3. &#8220;Summer&#8221; not even a hard date, just the season. Here&#8217;s why that&#8217;s a big ball of fail for a company that should have the resources to push ahead faster than most.</p>
<p>The TouchPad will weigh 1.6lbs. The iPad weighs 1.5lbs. The iPad 2 is rumored to weigh a bit less, My guess 1lb or close to it. So the TouchPad will launch weighing MORE than the PREVIOUS MODEL iPad. If it launched now. a .1lb difference wouldn&#8217;t be a thing, but a half pound difference in weight? That&#8217;s gonna be noticed. I want a TouchPad like a crackhead needs a fix, but will I wait 6 months? maybe, maybe not. Most won&#8217;t.</p>
<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2011/02/the_next_six_months" target="_blank">Gruber</a> speculates that we&#8217;ll see an iPad 3 or 2.5around September, so the TouchPad will likely be outmoded twice over within months of launch. Wonder how long it&#8217;ll take for the TouchPad 2? a year?</p>
<p>I have no clue what else HP has cooking, but clearly they still think like it&#8217;s the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s and you can take 6 months to a year to roll something out. It&#8217;s gonna be a hard lesson to learn.</p>
<p>That brings us to Nokia. I&#8217;ve had a few Nokia devices, and liked most of them. Well the earlier ones, at least. The last two, were a confusing mess. I&#8217;m not a dummy, and can figure out most OS&#8217;s etc, and mobile OS&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t require &#8220;figuring out&#8221; in the first place. I could barely get apps installed on my N97, and Gave up completely on my whatever it was that followed. And really Nokia, stylii? in 2009 when I got my last Nokia device, it still required a stylus. Come on guys!</p>
<p>Now they&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2011/feb11/02-11partnership.mspx" target="_blank">announced they&#8217;re partnering with Microsoft</a>. Bad move. Why? It&#8217;s becoming more and more clear to me, that the mobile platforms that will win, are the ones where it&#8217;s a hardware and software play. Apple, HP (if they can start thinking like a modern company) and RIM. All control their hardware and OS. There&#8217;s no AT&amp;T branded crap. Sure there might be AT&amp;T apps, and that sucks, but the UI is the same. There&#8217;s no blackberry curve with Motorola sense, etc. The experience is the same across networks (other than carrier specific apps that preload of course, which suck, but whatever, they&#8217;re not changing the UI/UX). Google and Microsoft don&#8217;t have that control. Well we know Google doesn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s TBD whether Microsoft does. I&#8217;ve seen exactly two WP7 devices in the wild, and both were developer phones. Microsoft has shown that it can&#8217;t stay competitive with Mobile OS. They dominated when there wasn&#8217;t any serious smartphone competition, but times have changed. Maybe they&#8217;ll surprise me, but I doubt it. My play had i somehow found myself in charge of Microsoft. Forget phones. Re-tool Win7 to be touch only tablet OS. Not a bastard &#8220;use a stylus&#8221; tablet OS, a complete re-tooling, like Apple did with iOS. It&#8217;s OS X underneath after all. Focus on tablets, it&#8217;s a strong market now thanks to Apple, but it&#8217;s gonna get stronger, and there&#8217;s a dirth of quality OS&#8217;s for tablet devices. Phones are consumer electronics, lost and tossed in a time span that measures months more than years. Tablets, while heading towards commodity, will be everywhere. Households will have as many or more of them than phones.</p>
<p>Apple leads, that doesn&#8217;t mean you have to follow.</p>
<p>What do you think? Will Microsoft pull Nokia out of the fires? Will Nokia and M$ fall together? Will HP miss the mark, and slide out of mobile quietly when only 3 TouchPads sell? Will we all be rolling in iCars to our iHouses, wearing iKicks?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2011/02/the-mobile-playground-is-shrinking-buh-bye-nokia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney world, it&#8217;s not so magical</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/12/disney-world-its-not-so-magical/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/12/disney-world-its-not-so-magical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 02:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok so we spent much of last week and Christmas day in Orlando with the In-laws. Mom-inlaw wanted to do Disney World.

Overall, I had a good time. Having been to Disney World with my mom two years ago, there wasn't much "awe" happening since in 2 years Disney hasn't done much to the place.

Magic Kingdom

I was really bummed that the Haunted Mansion wasn't all "nightmare Before Christmas"-ed out. Must be a CA thing? Overall the park wasn't too crazy, crowded to be sure, but not bad. It's funny tho, i was talking to Mike Lee about his recent trip to the Magic Kingdom and he was saying how it's odd when you see things not go right. Disney (like Apple) tries really hard to manage the entire experience, and when something goes wrong it's glaringly wrong. Well we definitely had the BMF experience at the Kingdom.

Apparently part of experience now when waiting in line is to have the line be less a line, and more a mob. On two, maybe three rides when the iron bound queue ended and we got into the actual ride building, Disney employees informed us that the line wasn't single file, fill all available space. I'm guessing as a way to make the lines outside seem shorter, or something. However as in all cases with mobs, it quickly went from "happiest place on earth" to "mob rules; cut in front, elbow and kick your way into the Pirates of the Caribbean" 

So that kinda sucked and really ruined the experience of the ride. Thankfully most lines weren't too long in general, and we fast passed the popular stuff. 

Christmas day, we were flying home, so after breakfast with the fam we went to epcot to walk around. To get from breakfast to Epcot/our hotel we had to go past the Magic Kingdom. Here I was thinking, "Who the hell wants to be at Disney World on Christmas day?" Turns out, a lot of people do! We asked the gal behind the counter at hour hotel about it and she said, at around noon that day they were at "level 3" meaning only season pass holders and resort guests could get in. The park was already turning away folks who were staying elsewhere or driving in. ON CHRISTMAS DAY! She said on New Years Eve day, they'll be at "level 4" meaning once you leave, you can't get back in, and even resort guests and season pass holders might not get in.

I gotta admit, I'm amazed that it's that busy on Christmas. New Years, sure, I bet it's a pretty fun party, but christmas?!

Oh and Space Mountain, the new music sucks. I need a fast rock track to make the ride fun, the current music is way to mellow, i found myself just sitting there waiting for the ride to end.

Epcot

My favorite part of being in Orlando is Epcot. Mostly because of the world tour part, and beer. Epcot itself is fun, the rides are cool, and the new (even new to me) Nemo ride is pretty sweet. Actually the ride is lame, but there's an aquarium attached (you can just walk into that part, the ride exits there) that is really awesome. 

It's funny, we went to a beer/snack cart in the United Kingdom Pavilion, and i got mocked (rightfully so) for ordering a Stella. 

Also, if you like trying candy we don't get in the states, the Twinnings Tea shop has a pretty good, but small selection. SKIP the turkish Delight. This ain't Narnia!

Thankfully, with the Magic Kingdom being so crowded on Christmas day, Epcot was not. We breezed thru the park using up the last of our meal plan snacks with hardly anyone else around. AWESOME!



Meal Plans

I dont think the meal plans are worth it. Ours was actually free with our package booking, so that was nice. I'd have been annoyed if I had paid for it. For one thing it's very rigid. A "meal" is an entree, drink (non alcoholic) and dessert. I don't like dessert and would often prefer an appetizer, no go cowboy! (Props to the waiter at Nine Dragons in Epcot. he hooked us up with some apps for free. Course with a party of 8 and 18% tip built in, why not make sure we're happy. I know we added a little more tip to the bill)

The way the plan (ours at least) worked was we got 4 meals, 4 snacks, and 4 quicks. After cracking the code on what exactly each of those was, then it was a matter of scoping out the icon on the menus around the parks to see what applied and what didn't, and then having to tell the worker, "I want a snack, what's that entail here?" every time.

So overall it was way more effort than it was worth. 



Ok that's a quick and dirty run down of my christmas (oh and along with being at Disney World on Christmas, flying on Christmas is also very popular! WTF) vacation.

All in all, a good time. <p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so we spent much of last week and Christmas day in Orlando with the In-laws. Mom-inlaw wanted to do Disney World.</p>
<p>Overall, I had a good time. Having been to Disney World with my mom two years ago, there wasn&#8217;t much &#8220;awe&#8221; happening since in 2 years Disney hasn&#8217;t done much to the place.</p>
<p><strong>Magic Kingdom</strong></p>
<p>I was really bummed that the Haunted Mansion wasn&#8217;t all &#8220;nightmare Before Christmas&#8221;-ed out. Must be a CA thing? Overall the park wasn&#8217;t too crazy, crowded to be sure, but not bad. It&#8217;s funny tho, i was talking to <a href="http://le.mu.rs/motherfucker/motherfucker.html" target="_blank">Mike Lee</a> about his recent trip to the Magic Kingdom and he was saying how it&#8217;s odd when you see things not go right. Disney (like Apple) tries really hard to manage the entire experience, and when something goes wrong it&#8217;s glaringly wrong. Well we definitely had the BMF experience at the Kingdom.</p>
<p>Apparently part of experience now when waiting in line is to have the line be less a line, and more a mob. On two, maybe three rides when the iron bound queue ended and we got into the actual ride building, Disney employees informed us that the line wasn&#8217;t single file, fill all available space. I&#8217;m guessing as a way to make the lines outside seem shorter, or something. However as in all cases with mobs, it quickly went from &#8220;happiest place on earth&#8221; to &#8220;mob rules; cut in front, elbow and kick your way into the Pirates of the Caribbean&#8221;</p>
<p>So that kinda sucked and really ruined the experience of the ride. Thankfully most lines weren&#8217;t too long in general, and we fast passed the popular stuff.</p>
<p>Christmas day, we were flying home, so after breakfast with the fam we went to epcot to walk around. To get from breakfast to Epcot/our hotel we had to go past the Magic Kingdom. Here I was thinking, &#8220;Who the hell wants to be at Disney World on Christmas day?&#8221; Turns out, a lot of people do! We asked the gal behind the counter at hour hotel about it and she said, at around noon that day they were at &#8220;level 3&#8243; meaning only season pass holders and resort guests could get in. The park was already turning away folks who were staying elsewhere or driving in. ON CHRISTMAS DAY! She said on New Years Eve day, they&#8217;ll be at &#8220;level 4&#8243; meaning once you leave, you can&#8217;t get back in, and even resort guests and season pass holders might not get in.</p>
<p>I gotta admit, I&#8217;m amazed that it&#8217;s that busy on Christmas. New Years, sure, I bet it&#8217;s a pretty fun party, but christmas?!</p>
<p>Oh and Space Mountain, the new music sucks. I need a fast rock track to make the ride fun, the current music is way to mellow, i found myself just sitting there waiting for the ride to end.</p>
<p><strong>Epcot</strong></p>
<p>My favorite part of being in Orlando is Epcot. Mostly because of the world tour part, and beer. Epcot itself is fun, the rides are cool, and the new (even new to me) Nemo ride is pretty sweet. Actually the ride is lame, but there&#8217;s an aquarium attached (you can just walk into that part, the ride exits there) that is really awesome.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, we went to a beer/snack cart in the United Kingdom Pavilion, and i got mocked (rightfully so) for ordering a Stella.</p>
<p>Also, if you like trying candy we don&#8217;t get in the states, the Twinnings Tea shop has a pretty good, but small selection. SKIP the turkish Delight. This ain&#8217;t Narnia!</p>
<p>Thankfully, with the Magic Kingdom being so crowded on Christmas day, Epcot was not. We breezed thru the park using up the last of our meal plan snacks with hardly anyone else around. AWESOME!</p>
<p><strong>Meal Plans</strong></p>
<p>I dont think the meal plans are worth it. Ours was actually free with our package booking, so that was nice. I&#8217;d have been annoyed if I had paid for it. For one thing it&#8217;s very rigid. A &#8220;meal&#8221; is an entree, drink (non alcoholic) and dessert. I don&#8217;t like dessert and would often prefer an appetizer, no go cowboy! (Props to the waiter at Nine Dragons in Epcot. he hooked us up with some apps for free. Course with a party of 8 and 18% tip built in, why not make sure we&#8217;re happy. I know we added a little more tip to the bill)</p>
<p>The way the plan (ours at least) worked was we got 4 meals, 4 snacks, and 4 quicks. After cracking the code on what exactly each of those was, then it was a matter of scoping out the icon on the menus around the parks to see what applied and what didn&#8217;t, and then having to tell the worker, &#8220;I want a snack, what&#8217;s that entail here?&#8221; every time.</p>
<p>So overall it was way more effort than it was worth.</p>
<p><strong>Connectivity</strong></p>
<p>I understand we&#8217;re supposed to be in the park, spending money, etc, but is it that out of the question to make our time at the resorts more enjoyable?</p>
<p>1. wifi ain&#8217;t cheap, i know the idea (to hotels) is that if you&#8217;re paying a lot to be at a resort, $10-$20 for wifi (per DAY!!) is nothing to skoff at. Problem is, that it is. We had the mifi (crappy signal) but really, just give the wifi away, the number of guests who actually use it will never be that many. Shoot, there wasn&#8217;t even lobby wifi. Come on Disney! Don&#8217;t nickel and dime your guests!</p>
<p>2. AT&amp;T sucks. I know that&#8217;s not Disney&#8217;s problem, but bears mentioning. I never had more than about 1-2 bars, and was constantly losing my data connection. Even a few times fell to EDGE, and even &#8220;Searching&#8221; I suspect that was mainly due to overload, but come on there&#8217;s plenty of places to hide some towers in the parks.</p>
<p><strong>So, good time overall</strong></p>
<p>Ok that&#8217;s a quick and dirty run down of my christmas (oh and along with being at Disney World on Christmas, flying on Christmas is also very popular! WTF) vacation.</p>
<p>All in all, a good time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchbit.com/az/77-168/"><img width="468" height="60" src="http://www.launchbit.com/az-images/77-168/" /></a><br />
<small>(Powered by <a href="http://www.launchbit.com/lb/77-168/">LaunchBit</a>)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/12/disney-world-its-not-so-magical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

