Tag Archives: Apple

Google Wifi box

Thought on My First week with Google Wifi

I just switched out my Apple Airport Extremes for Google Wifi. I’m normally all in on the silo I’ve chosen (Apple usually). I’ve had Apple Airport Extremes since the second generation of them. They’ve never been the best devices, but again the silo. They worked remarkably well within the Apple ecosystem. Mac and iOS would see APs that needed setting up, etc. Easy. The app was nice enough.

Updates were few and far between, barely a scrap of pro user support, or more modern considerations, but they worked and managing them was easy enough from a non shitty app.

Google Wifi unboxingI’ve been keeping an eye on the emerging Mesh Wifi world, and saw this review. Wirecutter has a great writeup as well, but it didn’t cover Google Wifi and a few others, because they hadn’t shipped yet. One of my main things was it has to look not terrible since at least one will live in plain sight. Apple kit sets the bar high there.

I’ll admit, the unboxing was Apple like. A nice plain white box, subtle logo, three very pretty little pods resting inside. Cords and unsightly bits in nice individual compartments below. Nice.

Google Wifi Setup

Setup is pretty straight forward, and you can read all about it in the blog post linked above, so I won’t re-hash that. One thing I’ve learned in keeping up a home network, changing your network name is a big pain in the ass, so don’t unless you need to. Prior to booting the first Google Wifi up, I powered down the AirPort Extreme. Then as I went through the process I named my network the exact same name as the majority of devices would look for, and made sure the password was the same. Most things just reconnected no problem.

The one hassle I had in this area is that Airport Extremes let you treat your 2.4 and 5gHz networks as separate things, so I had “Wilker” and “Wilker 5G”. This was also my own thing, since it made sure my machines connected to the faster AP that was was serving 802.11ac and the slower b/g/n wouldn’t slow down the ac connections. A hold over for sure. The downside was that the device that would be the biggest headache, were the ones on the “Wilker” network. iDevice switches and the Sonos speakers. Things that don’t have a UI to interact with. Long story short, lots of resetting and reconnecting later, everyone is happy on the new and improved “Wilker 5G” network.

Google Wifi App

Google Wifi appWhile I like the app, it’s clean and pretty easy to use, it’s also the only way to interact with your Google Wifi. No desktop app, no (blech) web interface, sadly also no iPad app. Phone only. Deal breaker? No, but a pain sometimes when I’d rather use my iPad.

It is nice to be able to see my network like this, it’s one of the things I liked with Apple’s Airport Utility. This is even better since I don’t have to look at each device to see what’s on the network. They’re all listed regardless of which AP they’re talking to, very nice.

I’m not sure of it’s overall utility, but the idea of a priority device is in the app. google Wifi device list When looking at the list, you can tap that little green circle in the bottom right, and assign a device on your network priority traffic for one, two or four hours. I’m not sure why I would care do to that. It might be useful to do it indefinitely for say my media center, or the AppleTV to ensure streaming is always good, but I can’t imagine having to every few hours, pick who gets priority.

 

The other really nice thing in the device list, is seeing the data usage. You can see it in the list, and tapping on a device let’s you see that devices traffic either real time or back a few days/weeks/months. Kinda neat.

Google Wifi Mesh

Google Wifi meshI’ve been interested in mesh since I started reading about. The idea isn’t new, in fact I’ve used my previous generations of Airport Extremes in a mesh setup, but it’s much more manual and labor intensive to setup and manage. Google Wifi makes it much easier!

I do wish you could wire additional base stations to help spread the load down through the modem, but not a deal breaker.

The hardest part of set up was placing the units. Our house is a rowhouse, tall and skinny. My first thought was one unit in the office closet where the Airport Extreme was, then one upstairs at the entry to the rooftop deck since usually internet up there is the pits.

Except as you can see, the office closet isn’t a great location, I suspect because the washer and drier are right in line between the main google wifi unit and the office one. I’ll play with location later.

The rooftop one right now is in the master bedroom, straight down the hall from the office. The Unit gave an error, when on the roof. I’m not sure if it was just a fluke or if all units need to be close the main unit (which goes against my understanding of how mesh works). Will play with that one as well later.

I did some tinkering and realized my office AP was on the closet because that’s where the old Apple one lived. It was in there because that’s where the network drop was. Lightbulb moment, I moved the office unit into the room on a shelf and signal strength was vastly improved. The closet still has a switch for the wired devices.

Final thoughts.

So far so good. All devices are connected and doing well, internet speeds don’t seem any different, things stream well, etc. These are smaller and more discreet than Airport Extremes which is nice. We’ll see how Google does as far a feature updates, etc.

One update, I had a weird google service issue the other day. I don’t know if it was google DNS, or their servers or what, but it directly impacted the google wifi since the app talks to their servers as well, quite frustrating.

 

 

 

I demoted my Apple Watch

I’ve been debating whether to continue using the Apple Watch for a while now. AppleWatch has definitely gotten better since launch, but still hasn’t found a killer app/feature. Activity tracking is the thing that has kept it on my wrist. I had a Fitbit for years, and loved the data collection around my daily activities and health, Apple upped that game.

wooden watchThe final straw as it were, was my 40th birthday, my wife got me a nice wooden bodied watch. I wanted to wear it. So I made the decision to move my Apple Watch to my right wrist, and switch to an activity specific face.

If I were to buy a new Apple Watch I’d likely buy the smaller face model so it’s a little less “obvious”

Wearing two watches admittedly is some solid ’80-90s stuff, but so far it’s working.

I’ve dialed down the notifications on the watch so it’s just stuff I really really want to know about. I’ve switched to a face that shows temp, and activity.

Apple Watch as activity trackerI do miss seeing my calendar entries, but that’s a small price to pay. I’ve already begun rotating through my watch collection again and love it. I need to go to a jeweler and get batteries put in a few. They’ve been neglected too long and their batteries are dead.

My Apple Watch has rekindled my Love of Swatches

As a kid I love Swatch Watches. I only had one, but had many Swatch Guards to add some color.  As I got older I could afford a few more, and did. I have a thing for watches, I love them.img_0090

Eventually I moved from swatches to other watches. Lots and lots of other watches.

Then I got an Apple Watch and at first just had one or two bands. Apple sells theirs for honestly a ridiculous Apple price, however Amazon has plenty of non Apple bands to choose from, in far more colors than Apple offers. It went down hill quickly :)

On the weekends I have a nice leather cuff band I wear with my watch. It looks nice, and feels great. But during the week, especially with working out in the mornings or at lunch, I wear the sport bands.

img_0092Then it dawned on me, I have so many bands for my Apple Watch, why not mix and match them? From there I also found these nice little Protective Bumpers in awesome colors, and
boom, my love of Swatches and having a unique piece of kit was reborn!

I’ve gotten tons of compliments on the whimsy my watch bands show, which is fun.

Why I backed the Pebble Time

Say what you will regarding Apple potentially/likely/already dominating or otherwise killing all competition in smartwatches, Pebble found 50,830 people (at the time I’m writing this) to contribute over 11 mil to the next Pebble. And no matter how you slice it they can’t all be “Apple Haters” or even “just android people”

In fact most Pebble owners I’ve met have been iPhone owners, many i know backed Pebble Time as well.

I think the success (I suppose 11mil, and 50 thousand plus backers is as good as any metric) of the Pebble Time is definitely in part due to Apple. All the rumors, sneaks, and baseless guesses, and all around hype around the Apple Watch have brought smart watches much more into the public eye, that’s good for everyone in the space.

Will Apple sell buttloads of watches, of course they will. Developers will all want one or two, because they’ll need devices to test on, whether they wear it or not who cares. Those who buy everything Apple makes will also buy one or two. Lots of others will flock to buy this amazing new watch (or gadget, depending on perspective)

I’d guess many of the 50,830 Pebble Time backers will also buy an Apple Watch. I won’t be (immediately) among them, but many will I’ve no doubt.

First why I bought a new Pebble. I’ve got a Pebble now, in fact I backed it the first time. I love it. I love watches, unlike so many sudden new watch wearers, I’ve worn a watch since i could tell time. I own a dozen watches, my most expensive easily cost more than the mid level Apple Watch. I don’t buy or wear shit watches. The Pebble isn’t the most pretty of things, but it’s a good watch. Tells time, date, weather (depending on face) and when I’m in more social settings and grabbing my phone isn’t acceptable, it tells me there’s something I should see (after lots of tweaking with notifications to get it right), or who’s calling without grabbing my phone.

The Pebble does most of the things I want, and it looks like will be adding the last thing I need. More interactive notifications. This assumes Apple exposes that API in WatchKit, I haven’t looked. Being able to send a few canned replies to things is a great feature. If I was a voice memo person, the mic would be cool, maybe it’ll be cool for Siri things, I dunno. Color E-Paper is awesome, color with 7 day battery life, very awesome. One of the things I love about my Pebble is not worrying about nightly charging. When I first saw “color” I thought, ok one color at a time or something else, but the fact that it’s many, is impressive. From the pics and video it’s not as vibrant as the AppleWatch, but that’s fine with me.

Pebble has also done an admirable job of future proofing. The first gen Pebble will get many of the features shown in the Pebble Time kickstarter video. Not all, but many. The current model has things that at launch weren’t active, but are now, like an accelerometer. They team behind Pebble has made sure that the watch i bought in 2012, not only is functional in 2015, but is still getting features. That’s kind of important in watches. Watches aren’t a buy-n-replace annually thing. My Hamilton is over 10 years old, and runs great, looks awesome. It needs a new battery every few years. My Citizen eco drive, is almost 15, runs like the day i got it. I’m not certain (at least for gen 1 and 2) that AppleWatch will have that ‘feature’.

Detractors often complain about the Pebble’s non classy looks, i can’t argue that. I have much MUCH nicer watches in my collection, and was tempted by the Pebble Steel just for a nicer appearance, but wasn’t ready to commit the funds for the same Pebble as I own, but wrapped in metal.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ll eventually want an Apple Watch. Despite my overall love of things Apple, I’m not often pulled in early, and frankly the first gen gear is usually sub par.

First iPhone, not amazing and quickly surpassed by the 3. I didn’t buy a used first gen until we moved from iPhone OS, to iOS.

First iPad, not amazing, and quickly surpassed by the 2. Not terrible at all, but meh. I got mine on the first day, waited anxiously, and was done playing with it in 30 minutes. Things got better FAST, and I love my iPad Air 2. But in hindsight, should have waited for iPad 2.

Is there any reason to think the watch won’t be the same? That the first model will not be very powerful (we already have rumors the battery will be lucky to last a day), or very water resistant. Do I want to buy a new device for another $300-$400 in a year? Do I want a device that in 2-3 years (if that) won’t get new features? By the second or third year of the Apple Watch, it’ll be something to truly want.

Also, (of course this is speculation) the Apple Watch won’t have a ton of things I care enough about to warrant it over a Pebble. Sending morse code messages to people… cute. Useless unless my friends or wife have an Apple Watch.

health sensors, neat. I’m sure I won’t hate that info, but at the same time i don’t care that much. I care about steps, active minutes each day, all data I get from lots of sources.

Don’t get me wrong either, I’ll want to see and touch my friends first Gen AppleWatches. I’ll want to play with them and see how great they are, but I’ll be happy with my Pebble (and then Pebble Time) for a few more years I think.

I’d say my Pebbles will be welcome additions to my watch box, but in 7 days they’ll be powered down husks…

One more Stylus review

So I’ve done a few of these. Right now (and this one may be the one) I’m in love with the Dotpen stylus. It’s really nice!

IMG_0622The thing that drew me to it initially was the tip. I can’t stand those big nubbin stylii that have a nub that obscures what I’m doing. My other stylus has a fine point as well, and the Dotpen has a finer point!

On top of the fine point, I liked that the point was protected by a cap, like a pen, and that there was a shirt clip. Not that I’ll be clipping it to a pocket, but in my bag it’s easier if the stylus is clipped in. The cap is a nice feature as I tend to obsess about the fragility of the point. IMG_0624

 

 

The other plus (yes there’s more plusses than minus’) AAA batteries!!! The thing I hated the most about my True Glide, it takes AAAA batteries. I didn’t even know those existed, and they’re rare enough that they cost a fortune. Well a relative fortune for batteries. I can get a few eLoop AAA’s and be all set.

There’s only two draw backs to this great stylus.

The power button is right where you grip the stylus. I’ve accidentally turned it off a few times. It’s not a major issue as it just clicks on and off (this isn’t a BT enabled stylus, those are nice, but I’ll take universally useful over app by app useful).

The second draw back is a bit more severe. It’s noisy. My True Glide Apex has a soft rubber nib, and the Dot Pen uses a hard plastic. For casual use it’s not really that big a deal, but for taking notes, it’d be a deal breaker. I’ve more or less come to terms with not taking hand written notes on my iPad so that helps, LOL. However the little bit of art doodling I’ve done, it’s pretty clickie. Not terrible, but you’ll notice the sound and hear it.

Noisy nub aside, this is a very nice stylus, and works great on the iPad Air 2. If you’re in the market for a nice fine point stylus that isn’t a “smart” stylus, I definitely recommend the Dotpen

 

My iPad(3) post

I was just reading a post (of many) about how iOS5.1 still disappoints. I’ve also read a few “new iPad a dissappointment because…” posts.

Figured I’d throw this out really quick.

I like iOS 5. It’s better than Ice Cream Sandwich.

the iPad(3) means my Xoom is being sold to offset the cost of an iPad.

So yeah not at all disappointed.

Startups, who’s in to be Apple?

Like most of Nerd America I started Reading the Steve Jobs Biography last night. I got in some good reading at the gym this morning and started thinking. I haven’t made it to the Apple years yet, but as I was reading it, thinking about Apple, about Jobs, startups and about death, a notion started forming.

Who’s going to step up and be Apple? Heck, where are our Hewlett and Packard? Our Michael Dell?  Bill Gates?

I work in a space with a fair amount of startups, and being so close to Boulder I hear about a lot more of them, and of course I’m in the Silicon Valley for events a fair bit too, and of course I follow my friend Eric Norlin. So I’m not uninformed when it comes to startups.

I know there’s awesome startups out there doing cool things (like Bloom). I work in the same building as one. But in looking at them and at most other startups, I wonder, who’s solving tomorrow’s problems? Who’s working on making the next big thing? NOT the next thing for AOL or Google to acquire. It seems that most startups are starting to be bought by someone, existing more than 5 years isn’t in the plans. That certainly is the exit that makes the most financial sense for their backers, and the founders even. I wonder sometimes if our VC and Angel worlds are so wrapped up in ‘quick bucks’ and early exits, that they’re encouraging young founders to not focus on building companies that can or will be around 20 or 30 years. Let alone build companies that are focused on tomorrow’s problems. Sure messy contacts, old school comic readers, and lack of robot balls are problems worth solving, that’s not my point. My point is there should be a balance, and I don’t see it.

Looking at Techstars and Ycombinator I see awesome companies making cool things like gMail plugins and robot balls with LEDs in them, and new takes on training sites, sites about treating musicians like stock, and such. But I wonder will any of them exist in 5-10 years? I suspect not. They’ll either have folded up and moved on, or been absorbed into some other larger thing. And that’s ok in it’s own right, but where does that leave us? The Country of Dell and HP and Apple and Microsoft? I feel like it leaves us with a sad lack of innovative long term tech companies. VCs are bitching about immigration policy not letting tech founders into the country in high enough numbers. I’d argue the gov’t should be looking at these VCs and asking where the companies that will lead innovation are and why they aren’t helping build them? I’d be thrilled to let the next Bill Gates in on a Startup Visa, but not if he plans to simply build something he can sell to Microsoft for a quick buck.

I know in startup circles and no doubt in VC circles getting acquired is a win. In my book it isn’t. I remember sitting around beers with some friends talking about a company in Boulder that was bought before it even left private beta. To me that was a fail. Sure they made out like bandits, everyone got paid. But they were barely a business, they had maybe a few customers, maybe a few hundred, but they were beta testers not paying customers. I suspect that’s why I’m drawn towards brick and mortar style businesses. Conferences, coworking, etc. Because those businesses are immune or less politely often excluded from the hub bub of tech investing. Therefore for the most part they require bootstrapping which it seems so many startups can’t or won’t do. I’ve seen ideas live and die based on acceptance to Techstars. While I have no doubt Brad Feld and co. know a winner or at least a good horse when they see it, I’m sure they’d agree they can’t see all the winners (or losers) all the time.

That kinda brings this all back around for me. I’ve never asked for money or (at least yet) taken out a bank loan for 360|Conferences or Uncubed. I live and die by what I can do on my own (or with partners as the case may be). In both cases i think to myself often, are these businesses that will be around in 10 years? Can they be a legacy, can I actually do something good with them? I think both can. I don’t know if either will, but I think both can, and I’m happy to try and find out. I think both started for the right reasons. Trying to change systems that exist, for the better of the communities they exist in,  which to me is the right reason to start a business. Will I get rich? be acquired by someone? Probably not on both counts, but that’s ok because that wasn’t and isn’t my motivator. I like money don’t get me wrong :) I want to live a comfortable life, but that’s the extent of it. I don’t need to make something someone else wants to buy so I can pay back investors and retire at 35.

I wonder if startup founders go to bed at night thinking about the future. Not the future where they get bought, where tech crunch writes them up and they secure yet another round of funding. A future where they employ thousands. A future where they and their product/service are shaping lives. A future where they make a difference for more than a year. Sure payroll next month is important, press is important I’m not discounting that, but if they’re not thinking about 10 years from now, I’d say they’re doing it at least a little wrong.