<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>johnwilker.com &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnwilker.com/tag/iPhone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnwilker.com</link>
	<description>John Wilker: Community, Code, Randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iApp Review &#8211; Landformer</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/iapp-review-landformer/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/iapp-review-landformer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I met Owen Goss at the first 360&#124;iDev I organized, and instantly liked him. If nothing else he takes my polar bear jokes in stride, that&#8217;s pretty big :) He&#8217;s an awesome developer, great speaker, and his latest game LandFormer (iTunes Link) is an awesome time suck! That&#8217;s a good thing :) Owen&#8217;s not new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0003.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1132" title="IMG_0003" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0003.png" alt="" width="480" height="320" /></a>I met Owen Goss at the first <a href="http://360idev.com" target="_blank">360|iDev</a> I organized, and instantly liked him. If nothing else he takes my polar bear jokes in stride, that&#8217;s pretty big :)</p>
<p>He&#8217;s an awesome developer, great speaker, and his latest game <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/landformer/id350807495?mt=8" target="_blank">LandFormer</a> (iTunes Link) is an awesome time suck! That&#8217;s a good thing :)</p>
<p><a href="http://streamingcolour.com/" target="_blank">Owen&#8217;s not new to games</a>, but I think this latest release is his coming out game. This is the game that&#8217;s the start of truly awesome things for Owen.</p>
<p>Ok enough gushing!</p>
<p>LandFormer is a straightforward puzzle game, you don&#8217;t really need instructions or tutorials, pick it up, try it out and away you go.</p>
<p>The objective is to make the ground perfectly flat; raising and lowering the terrain in patterns to accomplish your goal.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got 6 patterns and 2 choices of terraforming; Up or down. Each level has a  number of moves it should take to clear the level. Some are pretty straightforward, but the game quickly moves into, &#8220;hmm well maybe this, then this&#8230; nope, undo!&#8221; Which is good. I&#8217;m usually pretty quickly turned off by games that start too hard, or don&#8217;t progress past easy.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0006.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1134" title="IMG_0006" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0006-300x200.png" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>It&#8217;s very addictive, sitting there staring at the terrain, thinking through permutations.</p>
<p>Graphics wise the game is stunning, a perfect match to the game play. Ditto on the sound, the effects and background music are incredible and all blend together for a calming, tho sometimes frustrating brain game.</p>
<p>As if all that wasn&#8217;t enough, Owen has not just made the game expandable with In App Purchase, but also for free, you can exchange levels. You can email a level, heck you can tweet a level. People can follow your URL and add the level to their game to play. It&#8217;s easy to create levels, it&#8217;s basically solving a map, backwards :) just start arranging the terrain, when you&#8217;re done, save and share.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1135" title="IMG_0007" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_0007-300x200.png" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>The IAP is awesome, I&#8217;m really glad he went this route. I think IAP is one of the best features for game devs, to make money with their hard work.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t want useless crapware that I can&#8217;t use without purchasing something. Quite the contrary with LandFormer, you can go (I assume) forever without ever buying any of Owen&#8217;s premium content, getting levels from friends and the internet, but why? Sure that&#8217;s fun and I hope we&#8217;ll see more and more tweets with levels in them, but Owen has put together a shit ton of levels for purchase, why not get those and test your abilities. And test them they will!</p>
<p>Oh and the game itself is skinnable, how awesome is that!?</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t already grabbed LandFormer, go get it! Heck even Apple likes it.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-01-at-3.20.28-PM.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1138" title="Screen shot 2010-07-01 at 3.20.28 PM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Screen-shot-2010-07-01-at-3.20.28-PM.png" alt="" width="240" height="298" /></a>My only complaint (and I know Owen started this before the iPad was announced, at least I think so) is that it&#8217;d kick ass on the iPad. Either more complex patterns, or larger maps, etc. I think it&#8217;d be awesome. I&#8217;d suggest that be his next project, but he owe me bacon farmer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/07/iapp-review-landformer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So the ATT caps don&#8217;t affect you huh?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching all the tweets about &#8220;looks like I only use 400mb so AT&#38;T&#8217;s new caps won&#8217;t affect me.&#8221; earlier this week, and got to thinking. I&#8217;m wondering how much all these folks are considering the future. Not 2044 when we have iPhones in our heads, but a 2 months from now, maybe 3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching all the tweets about &#8220;looks like I only use 400mb so AT&amp;T&#8217;s new caps won&#8217;t affect me.&#8221; earlier this week, and got to thinking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering how much all these folks are considering the future. Not 2044 when we have iPhones in our heads, but a 2 months from now, maybe 3. Clearly AT&amp;T had a plan beyond &#8220;Making data plans more affordable and available for all. 98% of our users don&#8217;t even use close to 2g&#8221; and all. I mean we&#8217;ve met AT&amp;T right? When have they done something for their customers, beyond send <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/atandt-warns-customer-that-emailing-the-ceo-will-result-in-a-cease/" target="_blank">cease and desist letters when we email them</a>.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m wondering..</p>
<p>Skype on 3G&#8230; how much are we gonna use that? How much will that impact data use? I can see 2gb going fast with a couple business calls a week.</p>
<p>Front facing camera and some sort of iChat for iPhone&#8230; Will we get it? Who knows, rumors (again) say yes. How much will video chatting use up your data use?</p>
<p>Backgrounding of Pandora? How much data do you think you&#8217;ll use streaming pandora at work every day? On your jog? at the gym? at your desk?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot (possibly) coming soon that will hugely impact data usage. Surprised AT&amp;T pre-empted all that with a change in rates?</p>
<p>A change that by next week we&#8217;ll have mostly forgotten in the euphoria of a steve-note, new devices, and mac pros, and robot unicorns. AT&amp;T for their cluelessness in dealing with customers, isn&#8217;t stupid, and they just roped a ton of schmoes into very restrictive plans.</p>
<p>Take a long the view&#8230; it&#8217;s a different picture. I&#8217;ll be keeping my unlimited plan thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/06/so-the-att-caps-dont-affect-you-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dropbox as Anecdotal evidence of Mobile platform strength?</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was cruising around the dropbox blog and saw that they have a public voting site for feature requests. As I scrolled through the list, I noticed the mobile device requests.

It pretty much supports my assumptions on the mobile platform space right now.



iPhone, iPad, and Android are all already supported, WinMo (unclear, but I assume phone 7, but it was 6 months ago) is the next highest demanded platform, by a large margin. Pre and Crackberry bring up the final two spots. 

Sure it's anecdotal, but I can't help but wonder if dropbox doesn't serve as a microcosm of the mobile space? Clearly with their business on the line dropbox is pursuing the most demanded platforms first, sorry Pre folks, I know you love your phones, but you bet a lame horse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-28-at-7.35.39-AM.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1115" title="Screen shot 2010-05-28 at 7.35.39 AM" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Screen-shot-2010-05-28-at-7.35.39-AM-300x245.png" alt="" width="300" height="245" /></a>I was cruising around the <a href="http://blog.dropbox.com/" target="_blank">dropbox blog</a> and saw that they have a public <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/votebox" target="_blank">voting site</a> for feature requests. As I scrolled through the list, I noticed the mobile device requests.</p>
<p>It pretty much supports my assumptions on the mobile platform space right now.</p>
<p>iPhone, iPad, and Android are all already supported, WinMo (unclear, but I assume phone 7, but it was 6 months ago) is the next highest demanded platform, by a large margin. Pre and Crackberry bring up the final two spots.</p>
<p>Sure it&#8217;s anecdotal, but I can&#8217;t help but wonder if dropbox doesn&#8217;t serve as a microcosm of the mobile space? Clearly with their business on the line dropbox is pursuing the most demanded platforms first, sorry Pre folks, I know you love your phones, but you bet a lame horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/05/dropbox-as-anecdotal-evidence-of-mobile-platform-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Letter to Apple? Come on</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/open-letter-to-apple-come-on/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/open-letter-to-apple-come-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than see Apple go to an exclusive event for executives who don't want to touch the unwashed masses, I'd love to see Apple support the developer community. Hey Steve, Phil, et. al. Come to the next 360&#124;iDev. Meet the people writing the apps, meet the developers who bought 4 iPads. After all, they (IMHO) more than any one in attendance at Web 2.0 Summit, are the people important to Apple. The Developer community is buying iPads like their going out of style, buying each other's apps/games, etc. They're the early adopters, the strongest pro-Apple voices, etc.

I do agree with the letter in so far as the Apple of Today isn't the Apple I fell in love with. It's not the Apple of the Powerbook, the Newton, the Performa. Times change, and (as many do) if you argue bank accounts as an indicator, Apple is doing something right. I'm tickled pink (I'd be more tickled if I owned Apple stock) that Apple isn't $8/share. I remember when it was. As a kid in school, I checked the price daily in the paper before I left the house. I saved and saved and bought a Newton, I bought a powerbook 510 for College (ok well my folks did). But I'd love to see that Apple (tempered by age, fine) come back. The Apple of "Think Different", the Apple of Ellen Feiss.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just finished reading the &#8220;<a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/04/_an_open_letter_to_apple_regarding_the_companys_approach_to_conversation_with_its_peers_and_its_community.php" target="_blank">Open Letter to Apple</a>&#8221; penned by John Battelle and Tim O&#8217;Reilly. The self serving nature is a bit over the top for my tastes. &#8220;Please come to our exclusive, invite only, outrageously expensive summit, that has been seeing lower and lower (I assume) attendance. You&#8217;d be a really big draw.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thoughts on the whole thing (the open letter, Flash, Apple Culture)</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s phone. I don&#8217;t want Flash on the iPhone because it often has trouble enough running native apps. I haven&#8217;t missed flash once on my iPhone. i DO want Flash on the iPad. I think it makes way more sense. The CPU is faster, the screen is bigger. I&#8217;d watch hulu, CBS, NBC, etc on my iPad. I love Adobe, I love Flex and Flash (like any programming language, the shitty apps, are written by shitty developers. To say there aren&#8217;t stinkers in the app store would be an outright lie), but it&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s toy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad Adobe finally decided to move on!</p>
<p>Rather than see Apple go to an exclusive event for executives who don&#8217;t want to touch the unwashed masses, I&#8217;d love to see Apple support the developer community. Hey Steve, Phil, et. al. Come to the next <a href="http://360idev.com">360|iDev</a>. Meet the people writing the apps, meet the developers who bought 4 iPads. After all, they (IMHO) more than any one in attendance at Web 2.0 Summit, are the people important to Apple. The Developer community is buying iPads like their going out of style, buying each other&#8217;s apps/games, etc. They&#8217;re the early adopters, the strongest pro-Apple voices, etc.</p>
<p>I do agree with the letter in so far as the Apple of Today isn&#8217;t the Apple I fell in love with. It&#8217;s not the Apple of the Powerbook, the Newton, the Performa. Times change, and (as many do) if you argue bank accounts as an indicator, Apple is doing something right. I&#8217;m tickled pink (I&#8217;d be more tickled if I owned Apple stock) that Apple isn&#8217;t $8/share. I remember when it was. As a kid in school, I checked the price daily in the paper before I left the house. I saved and saved and bought a Newton, I bought a powerbook 510 for College (ok well my folks did). But I&#8217;d love to see that Apple (tempered by age, fine) come back. The Apple of &#8220;Think Different&#8221;, the Apple of Ellen Feiss.</p>
<p>Embrace the community that loves and supports you. Embrace the community that was there before the iPhone, before Unibody macs, etc. Embrace the community writing the apps that make the devices awesome.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the future hold for Apple, who knows. I&#8217;d love to see them take a more active, supportive role in the community that exists around them though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/open-letter-to-apple-come-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe needs to buy Palm.</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe MAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picture this.

Adobe buys Palm. Retools WebOS (or goes android, but I think that's a bad idea) to be more Flash focused. Basically create a "Flash Phone" Build out a marketplace, somewhere between Draconian Apple, and Hippy-free-for-all Google, for Flash devs to build and sell their apps. SELL. Adobe, you build the market, and back out. Don't start building your own things and giving them away for free. That screws your community over, cut it out!

Flash Devs have been denied a reliable, useful marketplace... well pretty much forever. Companies like Litl are working on devices to show how awesome Flash apps (Channels) can be, and hopefully help developers make money too. Adobe could easily kill some of their soon-to-be-dead-but-no-one-knows-it-yet projects, and focus on a mobile SDK for Devs to build stand alone "apps" that the "Flash Phone" could run. 

Apps that exist as good citizens, outside a browser, as a standalone executable/process. They kill when closed, and don't burn through the CPU. This is totally possible!

I know I'd buy a Flash Phone (assuming it's the Pre aka nice hardware) in a heartbeat. I'd want to support the community, but I also think it's a huge untapped market. Look at the flash content out there on the web! So much could easily become apps. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>To screw Apple. It&#8217;s clear that no matter how much, begging, suing (this is a bad idea anyways), cajoling, &#8220;I&#8217;m with Adobe&#8221;ing, etc, takes place, Apple has given the one finger salute to Adobe. That&#8217;s that. It&#8217;s their phone, there&#8217;s lots of other handsets for Adobe to play with.</p>
<p>Frankly, as much as I&#8217;d love to have Flash on my iPad (not my iPhone though) it&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s call. I don&#8217;t agree, but since they don&#8217;t call me to ask my opinion, I assume they don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p><strong>Palm is for sale</strong>. The Pre is a nice phone, it&#8217;s actually frakkin sexy, I dig it. WebOS, isn&#8217;t that bad either. If Palm had 1. not gone with Verizon, and 2. listenned to their developer community, and 3. not been retards about brand/marketing/and reach, the Pre would be a huge hit. Instead, <strong>Palm is for sale</strong>.</p>
<p>Picture this.</p>
<p>Adobe buys Palm. Retools WebOS (or goes android, but I think that&#8217;s a bad idea) to be more Flash focused. Basically create a &#8220;Flash Phone&#8221; Build out a marketplace, somewhere between Draconian Apple, and Hippy-free-for-all Google, for Flash devs to build and sell their apps. SELL. Adobe, you build the market, and back out. Don&#8217;t start building your own things and giving them away for free. That screws your community over, cut it out!</p>
<p>Flash Devs have been denied a reliable, useful marketplace&#8230; well pretty much forever. Companies like <a href="http://litl.com/" target="_blank">Litl</a> are working on devices to show how awesome Flash apps (Channels) can be, and hopefully help developers make money too. Adobe could easily kill some of their soon-to-be-dead-but-no-one-knows-it-yet projects, and focus on a mobile SDK for Devs to build stand alone &#8220;apps&#8221; that the &#8220;Flash Phone&#8221; could run.</p>
<p>Apps that exist as good citizens, outside a browser, as a standalone executable/process. They kill when closed, and don&#8217;t burn through the CPU. This is totally possible!</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;d buy a Flash Phone (assuming it&#8217;s the Pre aka nice hardware) in a heartbeat. I&#8217;d want to support the community, but I also think it&#8217;s a huge untapped market. Look at the flash content out there on the web! So much could easily become apps.</p>
<p><strong>Flash Devs need to stop giving everything away in the hope of attracting consulting business! Build things people will pay for, and sell them! You guys are your own worst enemy! You&#8217;re not helping the community!</strong></p>
<p>So Adobe, if you&#8217;re reading this, I know hardware isn&#8217;t your thing, but hey, consumer electronics wasn&#8217;t Apple&#8217;s when they launched the iPod (hardware still was, I know, it&#8217;s an imperfect comparison), and they&#8217;ve pretty much crushed that market now. You need to give up on the iPhone, yeah I know it&#8217;s the pits, but rather than waste time suing, being snarky on stage at MAX, and building hacky work arounds in Flash Pro, move on. You&#8217;re bigger than this &#8220;Let me in! Let me in!&#8221; nonsense. I want Adobe to shine, and rock the house! I want Adobe to do what it does best! Innovate! Build tools that let developers do mind blowing things! Now&#8230; Provide hardware for those mind blowing things to live on!</p>
<p>Ok that&#8217;s it! What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/adobe-needs-to-buy-palm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad&#8230;.. nice but not magical, yet (my Review)</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I'm writing this on my iPad. I'm not feeling the magic. (update, i had to save it so I could edit on my Macbook, else this post take would've taken 40 years to write)

Don't get me wrong, it's pretty, but not useful. Yet.

And before you decide I'm just an Apple hater, let me lay out my credentials for those that don't know me.

I own:

Unibody Macbook, 2 Minis, 3 iPods (including an iPod Photo), 2 iPhones, 1 iPad, 2 Airport Express, 1 Airport Extreme, my wife has a white plastic macbook.

I've Previously owned:

a Macbook Pro, Newton 110, Powerbook 510, Performa.  I think it's safe to say my fanboi-ness is secure.

That out of the way.

The iPad is a very pretty device, and if your life (as some do) revolves around reading websites, watching videos, and .... well that's it. Checking email I suppose too. Then the iPad is the perfect toy for you (albeit, for those simple tasks, the price IMO is a bit steep).

I tried. I didn't write this review the night i got my iPad, I didn't write it Sunday night, I waited and actually tried to do things I'd normally grab my Macbook for.

First I went up on my deck, to get some sun, and enjoy working outside. Since I was just gonna reply to a few emails, I grabbed the iPad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m writing this on my iPad. I&#8217;m not feeling the magic. (update, i had to save it so I could edit on my Macbook, else this post take would&#8217;ve taken 40 years to write)</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it&#8217;s pretty, but not useful. Yet.</p>
<p>And before you decide I&#8217;m just an Apple hater, let me lay out my credentials for those that don&#8217;t know me.</p>
<p><strong>I own:</strong></p>
<p>Unibody Macbook, 2 Minis, 3 iPods (including an iPod Photo), 2 iPhones, 1 iPad, 2 Airport Express, 1 Airport Extreme, my wife has a white plastic macbook.</p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;ve Previously owned:</strong></p>
<p>a Macbook Pro, Newton 110, Powerbook 510, Performa.  I think it&#8217;s safe to say my fanboi-ness is secure.</p>
<p><strong>That out of the way.</strong></p>
<p>The iPad is a very pretty device, and if your life (as some do) revolves around reading websites, watching videos, and &#8230;. well that&#8217;s it. Checking email I suppose too. Then the iPad is the perfect toy for you (albeit, for those simple tasks, the price IMO is a bit steep).</p>
<p>I tried. I didn&#8217;t write this review the night i got my iPad, I didn&#8217;t write it Sunday night, I waited and actually tried to do things I&#8217;d normally grab my Macbook for.</p>
<p>First I went up on my deck, to get some sun, and enjoy working outside. Since I was just gonna reply to a few emails, I grabbed the iPad.</p>
<ul>
<li>While I enjoy seeing myself, i don&#8217;t want to watch my face as I type emails. That&#8217;s easily fixable though, so it&#8217;s not a knock. Why Apple is obsessed with uselessly glossy screens is beyond me.</li>
<li>First I tried holding it and typing with my thumbs. I prefer landscape mode, and have locked it in that orientation. I have big hands, so it&#8217;s quite possible, but not a long term thing. Then I set it in my lap, as many have proclaimed is the perfect use case&#8230; I got a sore neck. By this time I&#8217;d responded (lengthy responses sure) to two emails. Perhaps if I invested in a $40 (?) case from Apple that i could sit on our patio table, and use? Or buy a Bluetooth keyboard?</li>
<li>One email I needed to send an export of attendee data to. I couldn&#8217;t. The export is .xls of CSV. kudos to Mobile Safari for opening the .xls and showing me, but I needed to send it to some one. Sure the iPhone doesn&#8217;t support this, but if the iPad is a revolutionary bridge device between my iPhone and a laptop, I expect a few laptop like things to be there.</li>
<li>Of course since I can&#8217;t run two things at once, I had to close out mail.app mid compose to look up a discount code for a sponsor. Close mail, open safari, go to eventbrite, copy the code, close safari, open mail.app</li>
<li>Then I thought I&#8217;d take a break, check on my <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/we-rule-for-ipad/id361536763?mt=8" target="_blank">Kingdom</a> and my <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/godfinger-for-ipad/id361431917?mt=8" target="_blank">weird little people on Planet Wilker</a>. Thankfully the display is so crisp and bright, it overpowers (mostly) the sun, so i could actually enjoy those games.</li>
</ul>
<p>Last night I went to a user group meeting, taking only my Mifi and my iPad.</p>
<ul>
<li>The auto brightness doesn&#8217;t seem very responsive, so I was routinely blinded when loading something with a white screen in the darkened room. No biggy really, annoying a little, sure, but not a &#8220;Damn you Apple&#8221;</li>
<li>I had two tasks I was hoping to get done, or at least get started, while listening to the presentation. Write an email to attendees of 360|iDev (thru eventbrite.com&#8217;s email feature), and compose the last speaker email to speakers at 360|iDev using mailchimp. The result. FAIL. Both websites use HTML based text editors, apparently not the html web that Apple supports. Kinda crappy. Can&#8217;t use Flash, can&#8217;t use some HTML&#8230;</li>
<li>So I spent the UG meeting, not using my iPad except to occasionally tweet, and that was only because my iPhone was in my pocket</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to replace some of the things I do on my iPhone and my laptop</p>
<ul>
<li>I completely understand why Apple made the iPad support iPhone apps. It&#8217;s nice to launch and crow about 100k + apps. I have yet to use an iPhone app on the iPad that wasn&#8217;t completely and utterly fail. Why use it in 1x mode? I&#8217;ll just fire up my iPhone. In 2x mode, no app escapes the ugly tree. I understand the logic, but think Apple should have given developers more time to get their apps ready. I mean really, no facebook app? Hell, the mobileMe app&#8230; uh Apple. I know you want me to shell out $30 for the iWorks, but I&#8217;d love to be able to access my mobileMe account in a native iPad app, how about that?</li>
<li>I think the iPad will be much more interesting 3 months from now. Now that developers have an actual device to test with, those that (I can&#8217;t blame them) waited to actually use the device before building apps for it, will begin releasing apps. Right now the iPad app store is woe-fully anemic&#8230; well maybe not if you&#8217;re independently wealthy, and can afford every $9.99 app, LOL. Even then, there&#8217;s only a small list of apps I&#8217;m buying later, as I feel richer. Most of the apps I want, aren&#8217;t there.</li>
</ul>
<p>Yeah Apple is about the experience, I agree, and sure surfing the web is very nice, if you only want to surf the web and consume. If you actually want to create&#8230; well so far the iPad hasn&#8217;t done much to support creation. I read one review that gushed and gushed about how awesome surfing the web is. OK sure, but I don&#8217;t spend my day complaining about surfing the web now.</p>
<p><strong>So what do I like?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The feel of it. It&#8217;s a nice piece of equipment. The screen (once covered in a smudge/glare free cover) is awesome. Sure I&#8217;d like to not have letterboxing when I watch a movie but whatever, that&#8217;s a first world problem, and not that important to me.</li>
<li>The OS, it&#8217;s the iPhone OS, which while I wish wasn&#8217;t so closed off, and anti-hacker (Pro user), it&#8217;s an easy OS to understand.</li>
<li>The Apps. iPad apps, are nice. They use the screen really well. Those that will shine are the ones that didn&#8217;t simply recompile for the larger device.</li>
<li>The future potential. The iPad right now, for me is a cute toy that gets attention, and let&#8217;s me play a few games, and waste time. The iPad in 6 months, could seriously kick ass. There will be more apps that are useful, there will be (Please Apple, it&#8217;s kinda obvious) some way for me to work on files in mobileMe (or Googledocs) over the cloud. Screw this dragging files into iTunes, and back and forth. It&#8217;s 2010 Apple, you have a cloud storage service, that people are paying money for now. Tie that in to your devices!</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What don&#8217;t I like?</strong> (and please, you don&#8217;t have to agree, I welcome your opinion, but if Apple makes you happy with what they deliver, don&#8217;t try to tell me what I should be happy too)</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s a bit heavy. Not really a &#8220;Bad mark&#8221; but it&#8217;s not light.</li>
<li>The video app needs an update. Looking at my movies, it&#8217;s fine to see the thumbnail and name. Looking at TV shows. A thumbnail from an episode, isn&#8217;t helpful. I had 6 icons. Some Seinfeld, some Big Bang Theory. No labels. I had to open one up to see that it was the folder for a season of that show. I like the breakdown by season, that&#8217;s nice, but not having any visible clue, it&#8217;s like hunting around to find the show you want to watch.</li>
<li>The single port. This is totally an Apple thing, and I wasn&#8217;t surprised, that they&#8217;d only have a dock connector, and sell $29 things that plug into the dock connector. Doesn&#8217;t mean I think it&#8217;s ok.</li>
<li>The lack of Flash. I don&#8217;t actually miss Flash THAT much, because I&#8217;ve had my iPhone for a while. I think flash on the iPhone isn&#8217;t really a deal breaker. But the iPad is another device entirely. I expect on a media consumption tablet, that I could hit up Hulu, or youtube (fuck having a separate app, that&#8217;s lame), or any of the what? 80% of the web that uses flash to deliver content. It&#8217;s a business play pure and simple, and as a business person, I can&#8217;t find fault. As a consumer, hacker, and person who tries to see thru bull shit, I think it&#8217;s weak sauce. &#8220;Open Web&#8221;, my ass, it&#8217;s the &#8220;Apple Web&#8221;, and them trying to come off like it&#8217;s anything but a power grab, is disingenuous at best.</li>
<li>the iPad of now. If <a href="http://360idev.com">360|iDev</a> wasn&#8217;t the weak after iPadmas, I probably would have waited. It just doesn&#8217;t do anything I can&#8217;t do now with the tools I have. I don&#8217;t need &#8220;an semi-adequate alternative&#8221; I need a &#8220;solid replacement&#8221;&#8230; the iPad isn&#8217;t there.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/04/ipad-nice-but-not-magical-yet-my-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why my iPad is coming 4/3 not &#8216;late April&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360|iDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading My friend Steve's post over at TUAW on the subject and most of his reasons (most of them) resonated with me. Enough so that I wanted to go into more details on my own.

Simple timing. 360&#124;iDev starts 4/11. I think it makes sense to have an iPad and play with one before and during the conference. To not would be like running an iPhone conference and not having an iPhone (or iPod touch). So it just made sense not to wait. 
wifi. Before I had my iPhone I had my iPod touch and carried it everywhere. Unlike Steve I travel in places with either no free wifi, or shitty free wifi. BUT, i have an iPhone now. So my iPad doesn't need that constant connection to the net. It'd be nice, of course, I want every device I own connected to the net. But for what I imagine my main use case to be (reading email on the couch, playing a game, or something else domestic like that) I'll be at home on my home internet. Plus But when that connection is thru AT&#038;T.... See 3. Then 4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading My friend Steve&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/25/4-reasons-im-not-waiting-for-a-3g-ipad/" target="_blank">post over at TUAW</a> on the subject and most of his reasons (most of them) resonated with me. Enough so that I wanted to go into more details on my own.</p>
<ol>
<li>Simple timing. <a href="http://360idev.com" target="_blank">360|iDev</a> starts 4/11. I think it makes sense to have an iPad and play with one before and during the conference. To not would be like running an iPhone conference and not having an iPhone (or iPod touch). So it just made sense not to wait.</li>
<li>wifi. Before I had my iPhone I had my iPod touch and carried it everywhere. Unlike Steve I travel in places with either no free wifi, or shitty free wifi. BUT, i have an iPhone now. So my iPad doesn&#8217;t need that constant connection to the net. It&#8217;d be nice, of course, I want every device I own connected to the net. But for what I imagine my main use case to be (reading email on the couch, playing a game, or something else domestic like that) I&#8217;ll be at home on my home internet. Plus But when that connection is thru AT&amp;T&#8230;. See 3. Then 4.</li>
<li>AT&amp;T. I truly hate AT&amp;T. I&#8217;m sure they know it, I&#8217;m equally sure I&#8217;m not alone. I can&#8217;t think of another company that has worked so hard at being teh suck. I mean you have millions of customers essentially gifted to you. You didn&#8217;t earn them, or even have to market to them to lure them to you. Steve Jobs handed you millions of new users. And you failed. AT&amp;Ts network is the suck, it&#8217;s terrible. I live in Denver, and now that Spring is coming, and the Rockies home opener is only 3 weeks away, I&#8217;m planning to have a useless iPhone. Every home game saturates what I assume is the single tower in LoDo, and while I have full bars, I have no network. So why would I want another device on such a craptastic network? Makes no sense.</li>
<li>Sprint MiFi. I love having a 5 user portable hotspot in my pocket (that&#8217;s what she said?) that essentially gives me AT&amp;T immunity. I can use my iPhone, soon (I think) I&#8217;ll be able to make skype calls if I really need to, etc. So when there&#8217;s no wifi for my iPad, and when the Rockies are in town, I&#8217;m still able to function like an affluent american in 2010. Fuck you AT&amp;T. (Note to sprint, the connection speeds on my Mifi suck! 3g? at .57 Mbits I don&#8217;t agree)</li>
<li>Ok with moo&#8217;ing. If you owned a first gen MacBook Pro, you know what I mean. Thankfully mine never moo&#8217;ed, and my MacBook AIR&#8217;s weird CPU throttling was handled by a hack until Apple released a fix. I know what I&#8217;m getting into and am ok with that. iPad V1 will be a vastly different creature than the 3GS equivalent (the model 3 years from now). That&#8217;s fine, I can live with that because 6.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m gonna jailbreak that bitch! You heard me! The moment the <a href="http://blog.iphone-dev.org/" target="_blank">dev team</a> (you guys are gonna work on it right?) release the JB, I&#8217;m on it. I love the freedom my iPhone 2G has to be customized, and do what I want it to do (Skype calls now, ha!). The primary reason my 3GS isn&#8217;t JB&#8217;ed is that it experienced a weird battery drain so I put it back in jail, I can&#8217;t have my primary mobile computer/phone be dead batteried in 3 hours. My iPad on the other hand, will never be mission critical, so it&#8217;s getting JB&#8217;ed ASAP. I think the true awesomeness (as usual) will be experienced by iPad owners who break free of Apple.</li>
</ol>
<p>So those are my reasons for ordering an iPad. As a consumer, it&#8217;s not a very interesting device. I&#8217;m not gonna spend whatever Apple asks for iWork, because that&#8217;s stupid. I&#8217;m not gonna work on spread sheets, or keynotes without a keyboard. Sorry I don&#8217;t see that working out well. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I doubt it. As 1. an iDevice conference organizer it makes sense I know what my customers are playing with, and 2. as a hacker wannabe, I can&#8217;t wait to see what it&#8217;s truly capable of.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth waiting an extra month, paying more money (AND then paying $30/month for actual 3G) just to have an always (except that AT&amp;T fails so often it&#8217;s more like 80% of the time) connected device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/03/why-my-ipad-is-coming-43-not-late-april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iApp Review &#8211; Procamera</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got an email a few weeks ago, asking me to take a look at ProCamera. Sure why not, I&#8217;d love something that was better than the built in app, and GorillaCam came just shy of the mark for me. ProCamera (iTunes Link) might be it. Procamera has an impressive list of features. Steady Cam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an email a few weeks ago, asking me to take a look at ProCamera. Sure why not, I&#8217;d love something that was better than the built in app, and GorillaCam came just shy of the mark for me. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/procamera/id300216827?mt=8" target="_blank">ProCamera</a> (iTunes Link) might be it.</p>
<p>Procamera has an impressive list of features.</p>
<ul>
<li>Steady Cam</li>
<li>timer</li>
<li>autosave</li>
<li>full rez zoom</li>
<li>virtual horizon</li>
<li>pro grid</li>
<li>compass</li>
<li>Digital zoom</li>
</ul>
<p>Here&#8217;s a zoomed in pic and a regular to compare.</p>
<div id="attachment_1079" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_5001.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1079" title="Zoomed in" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_5001-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zoomed in</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1081" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4041.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1081" title="Regular" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4041-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Regular</p></div>
<p>I was really impressed with the zoom, it&#8217;s digital of course, but NOT complete crap.</p>
<p>One of my favorite features, and what really lost it for Gorillcam, background saving.</p>
<p>Once you a take a picture, the UI bar turns red, you can take more pictures, and use the app like normal, but until it&#8217;s green it&#8217;s saving in the back ground.</p>
<p><a href="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4042.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1082" title="IMG_4042" src="http://johnwilker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IMG_4042-200x300.png" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a> As long as you have auto save turned on, just keep taking pictures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve actually moved pro Camera to page 1 of my homescreen, and the built in cam app is on the last page where Apple&#8217;s unremovable apps live.</p>
<p>Pros: Saving in the background. That&#8217;s huge.  The horizon is nice too. I always try to offset me horizons when I take pictures</p>
<p>Cons: None that come to mind, it&#8217;s a great app. i love the feature set, and the functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/02/iapp-review-procamera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My take on the iPad &#8211; Might as well join in</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[360Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite what my more fervent fanboi friends think, I don't hate the iPad.

As the organizer of a conference for iPhone developers, I can't wait to see what they do with the iPad. I can't wait for panels on the differences, etc.

This post isn't about that. This post is about me as a techy, power user consumer. The exact person the iPad isn't for.

Alex Payne captures my thoughts on this really well. From a Flex Developer standpoint (Yeah that's right hater, Flash!) I think Doug sums it up well.

I'm not gonna lie I let the rumor mill wind my expectations up more than I should have.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite what my more fervent fanboi friends think, I don&#8217;t hate the iPad.</p>
<p>As the organizer of a conference for iPhone developers, I can&#8217;t wait to see what they do with the iPad. I can&#8217;t wait for panels on the differences, etc.</p>
<p>This post isn&#8217;t about that. This post is about me as a techy, power user consumer. The exact person the iPad isn&#8217;t for.</p>
<p><a href="http://al3x.net/2010/01/28/ipad.html" target="_blank">Alex Payne</a> captures my thoughts on this really well. From a Flex Developer standpoint (Yeah that&#8217;s right hater, Flash!) I think <a href="http://dougmccune.com/blog/2010/01/28/the-new-york-times-without-flash/" target="_blank">Doug</a> sums it up well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not gonna lie I let the rumor mill wind my expectations up more than I should have.</p>
<p><strong>I was expecting</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>iPhone OS &#8211; Got it</li>
<li>Cellular plan of some sort &#8211; Got it</li>
<li>affordable &#8211; sorta got it. based on features it&#8217;s murky but it&#8217;s not $2000, so that&#8217;s something.</li>
<li>Ability to run more than one iApp at it&#8217;s native size in a window &#8211; Nope didn&#8217;t get that</li>
<li>A USB Port or two &#8211; Nope</li>
<li>Some type of awesome MobileMe integration that would allow me to download files on my iSlate straight to mobileme where I could consume them on my real computer. &#8211; Nope, not even close, and MobileMe still sucks, not even an upgrade to it.</li>
<li>Flash &#8211; nope. Though I wasn&#8217;t surprised. Apple controls the playground, and in true bully fashion has no reason to stop.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s it. The camera everyone wants might be fun, but i don&#8217;t use the one on my Macbook, so&#8230;</p>
<p>I can survive without the USB ports, since clearly apple doesn&#8217;t like us to have access to the guts, that&#8217;s livable.</p>
<p>No multitasking is a deal breaker. Let&#8217;s be clear, I have an iPhone, I have a Macbook. If I want the &#8220;Real web&#8221; I can look at it on my macbook which is nice and light. If I want the Apple version of the web, I can use my iPhone.</p>
<p>Assuming I got the device I wanted, I never in a million years Imagined I&#8217;d leave my Macbook at home. Clearly I wouldn&#8217;t leave my iPhone at home either. I&#8217;d cary the tablet for when I walk around, or just need to do some lightweight work. I&#8217;d carry with me at conferences for note taking and controlling the mac mini&#8217;s on site if they need it. etc. it&#8217;d be a utility device. I could stream music, and work on my keynote for Wednesday, I could fire up IM and not be away from it, ditto for twitter. I&#8217;d basically be free to roam and not be tied to my laptop at the registration desk.</p>
<p>When I was going out and didn&#8217;t need my laptop, i figured my iSlate would be with me. Heck I could toss it in Nicole&#8217;s purse, or just hold it.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s not (yet) the device I want</strong>.</p>
<p>I admit, my hopes were pie in the sky. From the vitriol flowing out of twitter the last few days, I&#8217;m not alone. It&#8217;s almost like the Jets vs. sharks scene in West Side Story. The die hard fanbois are rushing to the defense of Apple and the iPad and those dissappointed and even angry are rushing to call it names, and shout how Apple has failed them. I say them because while I&#8217;m sad it&#8217;s not the device I want, I have no doubt it will sell like mad and people will love it. Fanbois will love it because it&#8217;s in their contract. Normal consumers will love it because it&#8217;s simple, doesn&#8217;t do anything but surf the web and send email, etc. My mom truly is the perfect candidate for this device.</p>
<p>I agree with Alex that it seems that Apple is turning down a path, where hackers and power users aren&#8217;t welcome, and aren&#8217;t their core business. They&#8217;re truly turning consumer. This is good, great, but also bad.</p>
<p>Good because I want Apple to succeed, I truly love their products and industrial design (though I hope they ditch shiny backs on ipods. Clearly Steve jobs has had his finger prints burnt off to not see the smudges the rest of us see, or he has a Eunuch to operate his iPod and iPhone for him). Bad because as Alex says, they&#8217;re turning their attention away from what (I think) they&#8217;re all about. Apple was founded by hackers, Apple survived a long time on hackers, and tinkerers and power users.</p>
<p>Lately all their devices are less and less hacker, tinkerer, power user friendly. I&#8217;m sure plenty of self proclaimed power users will say otherwise, running Photoshop all day, with other apps open, does not a power user make in my mind. Open Terminal, hack your shit! Change settings via bash, etc. That to me is a power user.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not possible on the iPad.</p>
<p><strong>Hope in the Jailbreakers</strong></p>
<p>I think the iPad has huge, huge potential. I think those folks that are angry have forgotten one key thing, the first version of most Apple gear is just meh. the first iPod, not so hot, awesome by the standards of the day of course, but compared to what iPods can do now. no.</p>
<p>The iPhone 2g when it was released had no apps but those Apple provided. Had no MMS, had no (long list of things, some still on it)</p>
<p>the OS wasn&#8217;t that great, the features weren&#8217;t that great, etc. the iPhone 3GS is quite a different machine. More powerful, more feature rich. I bought my 2G iPhone when the 3G was released, on Ebay. i didn&#8217;t fully jump on the bandwagon of iPhone until the 3GS. That was when it was a device I could use and like, outside of my fanboiism.</p>
<p>The Macbook Air had issues with it&#8217;s CPU cores, etc. Macbook pros mooo&#8217;d. There&#8217;s plenty of history of first gen issues. nothing major and Apple fixes them, but it&#8217;s common that the first run is to get the bugs out. Apple will make the iPad better. Perfect? no, but I hope it is eventually something I&#8217;ll want as a consumer.</p>
<p>P.S. Fanbois, please refrain from commenting on why I&#8217;m dumb for expecting something other than what I got. I&#8217;m sure you got exactly what you expected, you&#8217;re buying 4 of them the moment the site allows it, and you and Steve are on the same wavelength and this device is 100% the most awesome revolution in computing. I&#8217;ve heard it all before and it doesn&#8217;t add to the discussion. You have a blog, use it.</p>
<p>I would like to know what everyone thinks about the iPad in the least fanboish ways possible, what will you use it for, what do you think it&#8217;s strength is, other than, of course being Magical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/my-take-on-the-ipad-might-as-well-join-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Dell can survive and truly compete</title>
		<link>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/how-dell-can-survive-and-truly-compete/</link>
		<comments>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/how-dell-can-survive-and-truly-compete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I am a Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnwilker.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The topic turned to Apple of course, the Apple tax, and what it means, and Dell.

We all agreed that we pay more, but where Dell and HP, and windowz peeps use the term in a negative, we see it as paying for a more awesome product, that is the sum of it's parts not the parts. The whole spec comparison has been done to death. Apple gear isn't RAM, HDD, glossy screen, etc. It's the whole package, the OS, the industrial design, the hardware, and the overall feeling of owning something that retains value, isn't plastic, and does what you want. 

We got to talking about Dell (not sure why we focused on Dell, we probably all owned a few so they're familiar)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a truly inspiring conversation with <a href="http://twitter.com/jakep36" target="_blank">Jake</a> and <a href="http://betterelevation.com" target="_blank">Dave</a> yesterday. We went to lunch then coffee.</p>
<p>The topic turned to Apple of course, the Apple tax, and what it means, and Dell.</p>
<p>We all agreed that we pay more, but where Dell and HP, and windowz peeps use the term in a negative, we see it as paying for a more awesome product, that is the sum of it&#8217;s parts not the parts. The whole spec comparison has been done to death. Apple gear isn&#8217;t RAM, HDD, glossy screen, etc. It&#8217;s the whole package, the OS, the industrial design, the hardware, and the overall feeling of owning something that retains value, isn&#8217;t plastic, and does what you want.</p>
<p>We got to talking about Dell (not sure why we focused on Dell, we probably all owned a few so they&#8217;re familiar)</p>
<p>We agreed, Dell (from now on, when I say &#8220;Dell&#8221; it means all PC makers) was <a href="http://betterelevation.com/2010/01/22/competing-with-apple/" target="_blank">competing with apple on product, not narrative</a>. Slapping leather on a laptop, does not a MacBook Pro killer make. Adding replaceable colored skins, ditto.</p>
<p>What we all agreed is that the issue isn&#8217;t competing on hardware, it&#8217;s competing on the package. It&#8217;s a plastic crappy flimsy laptop running Windows. Sure Dell has tried to go Linux before, but the mistake they made was in choosing an off the shelf Linux distro. Maybe they wrote a few drivers for their hardware (I surely hope so) but that was it.</p>
<p><strong>Wrong approach.</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many Apple product-killers fail to deliver because they fail to see the package, and try to kill the gear.</p>
<p>Mac&#8217;s run *nix. I know that, Dave and Jake know that. My mom doesn&#8217;t. Nicole doesn&#8217;t or doesn&#8217;t care. Hell I don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>Where Apple went right, and Dell wrong, they took BSD, and made it user friendly. The average user never opens console, NEVER NEVER has to compile a driver from source, etc.</p>
<p>Throwing Ubuntu on a Dell laptop&#8230; isn&#8217;t the same as throwing OS X on a Mac laptop. Dell missed the mark, but not by much.</p>
<p>What should Dell do? abandon Windows, devote time and money to taking Ubuntu or something else, and making it theirs. Yes it&#8217;ll cost a metric buttload of money, and time. Dell will have to stand by their convictions, and help show why choosing their OS is a good idea for their customers. OS X had Classic mode, it shouldn&#8217;t be hard for Dell to offer a mode that will run Office. Apple didn&#8217;t offer iWork for a long time. Apple owners had to use Mac Office. M$ isn&#8217;t stupid, they&#8217;ll be mad, but then they&#8217;ll make an Office version for Dell OS. Or Dell writes one. Shit, Pages isn&#8217;t Word, but it&#8217;s got what most people need out of a word processor. The rest of Word is crazy one off fluff, that bloats the app and adds value to 1% or less of the install base. (guessing)</p>
<p>When I say Dell has to stand by their plan, that means after 6 months or a year, they can&#8217;t scrap the idea, run back to Microsoft, and make nice. It&#8217;s gonna take time. They need to spend that time doing 2 things.</p>
<ol>
<li>Sell the hell out of Dell OS. It&#8217;s an uphill battle, but NO ONE likes windows. Given an alternative that did what Windows does (not the shit no one cares about, the important things), wasn&#8217;t bloated, wasn&#8217;t full of crapware, etc. People would choose that alternative. BUT it must be stable, it must not need the user to know that the console exists, and it must be supported. It&#8217;ll need drivers, it&#8217;ll need the regular apps, it&#8217;ll need a way to run old windows shit. It&#8217;ll need a wizard to help convert people from windows to Dell OS. it&#8217;ll need the same experience Mac converts get.</li>
<li>Improve the Dell OS. Show that it&#8217;s not a one off. within 6 months, release an update that&#8217;s more than a bug fix. Throw in a few new features. Add some Sizzle, but add a bite or two of steak too. Showing your fledgling user base that you&#8217;re committed will do wonders. They&#8217;ll know you&#8217;re in the game to win, and not &#8220;Testing the waters&#8221;, and they&#8217;ll become the cult of Dell.</li>
</ol>
<p>That&#8217;s it. That&#8217;s the secret sauce Dell is not seeing. That&#8217;s the trees in the forest. It&#8217;s not a better laptop with better specs. it&#8217;s not leather or wood. It&#8217;s not Aluminum unibody, it&#8217;s the narrative, and the experience. Windows will forever taint both, and Dell will never compete.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it. That&#8217;s the secret, that so many get (Apple owners) that so few get (PC makers, M$, Etc) that would make PC makers competitive.</p>
<p>Apple didn&#8217;t get to $50bil over night, you can take your 8% share and bank on that, Apple is banking with Money. (Please leave the &#8220;iPod is supporting it&#8221; out. Yes the iPod is the huge money maker, and uh, hello the iPod follows the same model. Dell DJ? what? what&#8217;s that? exactly)</p>
<p>That was our coffee talk :) I might have missed a thing or two or glossed over but that was the gist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnwilker.com/2010/01/how-dell-can-survive-and-truly-compete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
